blog




  • Essay / The Impact of Domestic Ideologies (DII) and Free Labor (FLI) on American Men and Women

    Society never imagined the impact of Domestic Ideologies (DI) and Free Labor (FLI) ) on American men and women. New gender ideologies have benefited both sexes in the long run. Domestic ideologies and free labor ideologies were the new principles that changed in the 19th century for both men and women. The DI is the principles expected of women with regard to domestic work since it claims that women have their place at home. FLI were the principles for men. The ideologies of men have also changed with modernization. Modernization and the changing nature of work impacted these new ideological shifts through the expansion of the market economy. Gender roles, for both men and women, remain perceived differently by society. Gender roles have become more defined. For example, it is more common to see more women working (outside of their domestic duties) and both contributing to the household. Thanks to all these factors related to domestic ideologies and free labor ideologies, our society has experienced a positive outcome. This benefited both in the relationship by being able to bring income into the household. Nineteenth century society was the first to experience these changes which, at that time, could seem positive or negative to some. Overall and in the long term, DI and FLI generate positive developments for both sexes. Most of the main principles of these new ideologies have had more positive than negative results. In DI, the principles are based on the idea that women are expected to remain pure and virtuous until marriage, which also means that women should have high morals and expectations. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay In Godey's Lady's Book, women are responsible for the values ​​and morals of the family. Especially because, as the other principle said, women were the moral center of the family. Before the 19th century, the primary purpose considered for women was to raise children. In Antebellum Women, the author notes: “Child labor forcefully presents domesticity as the woman's 'vocation' for which she should be trained” (p. 103). Society automatically believed that women should be trained from childhood and become nurturing and nurturing to care for their future children. Many believed that women had their place in the home and that in addition to raising their children, they should be responsible for domestic work. With the new ideologies, things have changed; women could work but they could only work from home. Most women had the opportunity to work as writers and publish newspapers; but all this work had to be done at home, while attending to their domestic chores. It was also acceptable for women to pursue education. This benefited women because they could become independent and no longer dependent on a man. Women were believed to be physically and mentally weak and this change gave them the opportunity to prove society wrong. One of the most positive outcomes of these ideas was the principle that women had control over their bodies, meaning they had a choice in how many children they wanted to have. However, a negative aspect was known: not all women benefited from DI; it was mainly aimed at women of the classaverage. The principles of FLI have also created positive changes for men. Men also have the opportunity to train and become professionals. Social mobility and independence were a key aspect of FLI; Men were expected to create opportunities for themselves to advance in social status and be independent. If a man wanted to marry a woman, he first had to prove to the woman's father that he was capable of providing for his future wife. An important principle that could be crucial to their reputation and success was self-control. It was not acceptable for men to frequent places like brothels. If men could not control themselves and were seen in such places their reputation in the workplace and with women was damaged. Society will not view them the same way because respectable men and jobs would not hire them and affect their financial success. Additionally, women would not consider them as partners. Self-control is also a way to avoid any type of STD. There are cases of married men who cannot control their sexual desires and seek a woman only for sex. Some men are even infected with a disease and then pass it on to their wives. As Amy Galusha states in a letter to her brother Leland, she mentions: “I think much of you and tremble for your well-being for many boys have been ruined by bad company” (p. 119). self-control is being aware of the people around us. Many young men do not think about the consequences when they consider being accompanied by women to a brothel. Besides self-control, FLI also consisted of self-improvement and equal opportunities. Men had the same opportunities as others to work and study, but it was their responsibility to improve and succeed. What they wanted to get out of their opportunities was their choice. The tenets of these new ideologies influence reactions to the murder of Helen Jewett through judgments about her lifestyle. There were those who attacked her when they discovered after her death that she was a prostitute; a prostitute did not respect the principles of the DI. She was no longer considered pure after being with many men. However, there were people who would justify his actions. They thought she had been seduced and lured into this lifestyle. Her murder became a fascination for many, not least because she was different from other prostitutes. Helen Jewett was also known because she was self-taught and loved to read. These principles also influenced reactions to the trial of Richard P. Robinson, as it also failed to adhere to the principles of the FLI. However, people were harder on Helen Jewett, her name was the center of attention in all the newspapers and it seemed that everyone had simply forgotten about Richard P. Robinson. All that was emphasized about Robinson was his family background. Society only cared about the fact that Richard P. Robinson came from a wealthy family. “Richard Robinson's father in Connecticut owned numerous tracts of land and served eight terms in the state legislature” (Cohen, p. 11). Even though his behavior showed a lack of self-control during his visit to the brothel, people only focused on the positive facts about Robinson. Only if Helen Jewett had had a wealthy, respectable family who could have protected her. I believe that domestic ideologies and free labor ideologies have had a positive impact on the development of American men and women because.