Integrating faith and politics can be difficult. Arguments can be made about whether faith and politics should be completely separated, or the two should be fully integrated. A happy medium between separation and integration can also be considered. Examples of each can be seen in the story. The complete separation of faith and politics has consequences (both positive and negative). A government separated from faith can be effective, but very inhumane and authoritarian. The complete integration of faith and politics is influenced by God and the Bible, but it can be just as defining as complete separation. Multiple disagreements in Christian doctrine would also lead to more challenges in government. Having a middle ground where only certain aspects of government are influenced by religion can cause problems in some areas. The middle ground could allow Christians to spread the Gospel (which is the purpose of the Church). When we compare these three options, we can see that one option appears to be an obvious choice. It is halfway between separation and integration that the Church can both remain relevant in politics and participate in the great mission. The complete separation of faith and politics can be reflected throughout history. The early theologians of the Church often had a very apolitical philosophy. The early Church felt obligated to honor the government, but tended to stay out of all political affairs (Bandow 1988:123). One of the first theologians to create this philosophy was Tertullian. Tertullian argues that Christians should have very little contact with the state, refusing to serve in the army or even attend public schools. In Tertullian's time, martyrdom was common. ...... middle of paper ...... his. It is also dangerous for the state to govern Christian doctrinal views. When politics and faith are mixed only in certain areas, a more fair and balanced approach to government can be formed. He gives religious free will to the people and the great mission is left to the Church. The only negative consequence can be controlled by the participation of Christians in the political process. When all aspects of each option are weighed, it can be seen that partially mixing faith and politics is the best option. Works Cited Bandow Doug. Beyond good intentions. Illinois: Crossway Books, 1988. Wuthnow Robert. Christianity and civil society. Pennsylvania: Trinity Press International, 1996Hicks Laurel, Thompson George T., Lowman Michael R., Cochran George C.. American Government and Politics in Christian Perspective. Florida: Beka Book Publications, 1984.