blog




  • Essay / Subjects and issues of the documentary film “Food, Inc”

    Table of contentsIntroductionAnalysis of the filmWorks citedIntroductionFood Inc. is a documentary film by Robert Kenner. The production of the film involved many people, but the most notable is Michael Pollan, the author of The Omnivore's Dilemma. He acts as a consultant although the film features him. Produced by Participant media, it took three years to make with a budget of around $1 million. Kenner says he used additional funds to respond to lawsuits filed by the documentary's subjects, such as those in the food industry. At the box office, the film grossed $4.6 million after its release in 2008 and lasts 94 minutes. It received largely positive reception and was nominated for several awards, including the Academy Award and Independent Spirit Awards in 2009. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayFilm AnalysisThe film examines industrial food production. Over the past few centuries, population growth and technological advances have changed food production. This requires technologies and changes in food production techniques to feed increasing numbers of people. However, industrial food production also has some disadvantages and the film examines a few of them. The downsides directly affect consumers and yet food companies hide this important information. As a result, customers make misleading decisions about their consumption. The goal of the film is to fill this information gap by giving customers more information about the foods they eat. The four main issues addressed by the supermarket are the quality of supermarket food and corn, beef, chicken and industrial chicken farms, pork processing, and failures of the role of government. Finally, it looks at practical steps that consumers or ordinary people can take to make a difference. For example, the company notes that supermarkets buy green tomatoes and ripen them using ethylene gas and that customers are unaware of this. Furthermore, scientists do not know the impact of this gas on human health and yet it is widely used in the food industry. The film also reports that the food industry doesn't want customers to know the truth. Another conclusion of the film is that food companies create the illusion of giving customers choice, when in reality most food comes from a few crops, primarily corn. Corn's outsized role is due to government subsidies that pay farmers to produce corn. Overreliance on corn is the driving force behind obesity, as consumers consume too much corn and calories, even without realizing it. The same problem is present in beef production, where industrial beef production has given larger companies a monopoly on food production. However, industrial food production makes foods susceptible to infection by E-coli, a powerful and potentially dangerous pathogen. To solve this problem, farmers and industrial food producers need to use more antibiotics, which is responsible for antibacterial resistance. Therefore, the activities of industrial food producers are directly responsible for some emerging health problems. Finally, the government has failed in its role of protecting the health of citizens. The big ones.