In this article, David Grann examines the work of Peter Paul Biro in an artistic authentication in a delightful title "The Mark of a Masterpiece" (Grann 1). Biro notably claimed to have innovatively designed a camera superior to all cameras available. This suggests that this character uses his own professionalism and ideas to achieve what he wants. In fact, he has reaped a dozen fortunes, including those from DARPA, NASA, several universities, as well as research and development fortunes from numerous departments of about five hundred technology companies, all from his own efforts. Therefore, we can assume that Grann was a genius who used the same gift to achieve success. Moreover, at thirty years old, he intelligently developed computer science suitable for processing highly definitive data. In fact, he was proficient in both DNA analysis and fingerprint forensics, as well as a deep understanding of art conservation and art history (Grann 2). With his professionalism, Grann contributed to the art world. He once said that everyone would only seek to see what he or she wants to see through portraits or paintings; a point of view shared by other authors. Therefore, we can conclusively state that Biro’s ideology as described by the author; as a unique genius, he composes his human idiosyncrasy which arises from his capacity for consciousness and exploitation characteristic of the elites of the art world. Artistic works are related to the professionalism and understanding of the individual, which also determines their understanding and interpretation of such work and this has been controversially demonstrated by different authors and filmmakers when addressing the same school. “Who is $#%& Jackson Pollock?” » (2006)Accor...... middle of paper ......d detachment may be small or large, however, all images, including photographs, include the artist's understanding when creation of the image. We can therefore conclude that artistic work is based on the ideals of the artist involved, but that what we want to read about it depends on that individual's perception of the image and what he or she has to say about it. intention to see these arts. Works Cited Berger. "1". New York: Penguin Group, 2008. PrintDobbin B. “Synthesis of persuasive arguments: “Persuasions””. American Center (2003): 50-54. PrintGrann D. The mark of a masterpiece. The New Yorker, July 12, 2010. PrintHeller N. Why a Painting is Like a Pizza: A Guide to Understanding and Appreciating Modern Art “Paintings People Love to Hate,” 6/11/2011, New Jersey: Princeton University Press . Print.Pollock J. Film: Who is the $#%& Jackson Pollock? (2006)