Sometimes the controversy between the degree of freedom or rigor of a society can intensify depending on the opinion in question. In this case, Plato and Machiavelli have very different ideas about whether a democratic society is correct or even dangerous. They in turn represent the contrast of the ideals of a perfect society and order. The way the ancient Greeks and Romans ran their government was to use three main styles of government: monarchy, democracy, and aristocracy. They did it in such a way that the three styles balanced each other. For the ancient Greeks, wealthier citizens, known as the Senate, held stronger governing power. They did this to ensure that all of their eligible citizens could have a say in government. If you own land you can vote, that's all that's required. Even if they were divided into separate sections of government, the elite would have the greatest power. This is because it was more focused on the idea of ​​an oligarchy. They believed that only male landowners should have a say in government and politics. While the ancient Romans were based more on a monarchy, they believed it was best to have a dominant central figure to rule the country. They too used the separate powers, but they were concentrated around a single divine individual. They believed that through a single leader they held the power of certainty and that this was usually due to individual achievement. The Senate would appoint the dictator or monarch. The people would then consider them as the leader of the empire. There were original ideas of moving toward Republican or Democratic government, but slight changes were made to the ruling ideologies. The idea of ​​a republic, or a republican ideology...... middle of paper......t will therefore not define their duration in their role. This shows that a heterogeneous government is much stronger and gives a greater sense of stability. It does not depend on one individual but rather on a variety of them. This creates a greater chance for the government to function properly. The fact is also that different parts of government allow their citizens to change. This means that you don't have to choose just one person, but rather several. I also like the structure better. Since three sections of government are in place, this prevents one from becoming too powerful. This means there is less anarchy; every branch of government has its answer. This means they are less likely to break down during a crisis, now that they have the ability to communicate to find the solution that would best address the situation..