Secondary groups are known to be a sociable interactive community that is sizable and more complex than a primary organization. Some groups are in different structures depending on the categories of the primary groups, social communication in the secondary organization develops fragile impulsive links. This can overlap a phase and shorten the duration to connect precise dimensions of movement. As most members of a group continue to have occasional contact with each other. According to Max Weber, it recognizes two forms of organization in relation to other categories of crowds and social gatherings, accepting the simple presence of a stratified community. Some social groups are more open and interactive to cooperate to carry out activities in different seminars, while others are reserved and quiet. Additionally, Weber explains that bureaucracies are a better type of secondary sources because one aspect is that the inability as a larger bureaucracy makes it complicated for leaders to correspond with each other. (Brym 2019) Additionally, larger bureaucracies develop simple competition and relationships indicative of a plan. (Brym 2019: 87) In my opinion, independent class-group projects are beneficial in a secondary environment because I prefer to work on my own dough rather than enlightening my group members, an ability to understand the task on my own -self and the students were more successful in working on their own objectives rather than in a group. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay First of all, independent class group projects are beneficial in a secondary environment because I prefer working on my own dough rather than enlightening my group members. In my experience, I can describe the secondary group as individuals who are more likely to be independent rather than dependent on each other. Secondary groups are as important as primary groups, because even if we do not become dependent on each other, we can still achieve our ambition and purpose by establishing a well-organized fragment to shape a larger vision. In my opinion, I have always worked at my own pace rather than that of the group members I am assigned to work with on a project. Instead, I feel comfortable having my own space to focus on the mission. It is disturbing in my opinion, to work with several people because a group can cause hesitation to obtain different hypotheses and perspectives, it can be difficult to find a common passion so that everyone is equivalent. An example of a stereotype in my class group project situation would be similar to an independent class group project where you have the ability to be creative to build the project in your own way without anyone passing judgment on your task. neither good nor bad. Most of the people I worked with had a particular mindset about how they wanted things to go their way, instead of valuing my perspective. Thus, independent class group projects are beneficial for the secondary environment since I prefer to work on my own dough rather than enlightening the members of my group. Second, independent class group projects are beneficial for the secondary environment because I have an ability to understand my group's task. own. An independent research activity as a class group is a great standard that we can use to stay focused on one.