blog




  • Essay / Should the development of a commander emphasize...

    INTROTo have an effective organization, it is necessary to have a competent leader, capable of applying and adopting technique and correct approach and possessing knowledge aligned with the contemporary environment and asymmetric warfare in order to effectively manage the organization. THESIS STATEMENT This essay will discuss the different levels of commanders and examine what attributes are best suited for these commanders and how and when it should be presented to commanders. In the military and business world, there are three levels of commanders who lead the organization or unit, which includes the tactical, operational, and strategic levels. According to WB Howieson and H Kahn, these three levels are related to each other and W pointed out that with limited resources and increasing responsibilities, leaders have developed in order to effectively lead and prepare people. There appears to be a need to improve management and leadership development. Howieson and Khan also state that with the abundant references and resources available on these three areas, the Army has placed more emphasis and study on leadership and command, but there are very few references available on management and similarly in the business field, which has focused more on leadership and management and very little resources on command. Leadership, management and command: the officer's trinity. WB Howieson and H Kahn. WHY is development necessary? Development is necessary to respond to the ever more drastic changes in this contemporary world as we have faced four types of war generations, according to William S. Lind, it began with the signing of the Treaty of Westphalia. in 1648, which marks the beginning of the 1st generation...... middle of paper ......n with subordinates and soldiers. The highest level of command is the strategic level of leadership where according to US ADRP -622 Strategic Level Leaders are major command leaders at the DOD level where they are responsible for large organizations and establish force structure, allocate resources, communicate the strategic vision, and prepare their commands and the Army for future roles. And from the perspective of the British military strategic level JWP 0-01, where the leadership is more focused on maintaining political independence, territorial integrity, the wider national interest and development as well as the The employment of military forces including the Prime Minister, the cabinet and the chief of staff. Considerable attention has been paid to the development of strategic leaders in various organizations, as many studies and articles have been devoted to the development of strategic leaders, especially.