Good versus Evil (essay)Early forms of good and evil are generally expressed through pantheons of gods associated with each side and sitting on the moral compass fighting for good or evil. . Moving forward in history, we see the Judeo-Christian belief in divine law that your entry into heaven depends on whether you are sinful or holy. In more modern concepts we see good and evil embodying your actions, individuals can have various qualities of both good and evil and justify whether that individual falls on one side or the other of the compass morality depends on the society around it. Today, good and evil are no longer a black and white concept, there is a general understanding of good and evil in society, but as individuals we can possess both qualities. Different societies and cultures play an important role in deciding whether actions are right or wrong and we often consider actions to be justified as legal or illegal in society. Although the law is another gray area as to what is truly right or wrong, there are many wrongs common to all societies, including acts like murder. Because we see a general consensus that murder is evil within human society, could we agree that it is evil? Yes and no. In many studies there is a common feeling of the impossibility of achieving true happiness, and in some cases the argument that death itself allows one to achieve happiness because existence in this world is suffering. Perhaps because death is the only way to achieve happiness, killing another individual would bring him happiness. The concepts of good and evil are kept relative in nature, because it is impossible to justify something as being truly good or bad. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay Another argument would be that, from a survival perspective, we maintain a moral compass surrounding life or death. Life is good if we continue to survive and death is bad because we no longer live. This argument can also be maintained in communities where a greater number of individuals in my community or village results in a greater sense of survival, greater numbers, a greater quantity of acquired goods and greater potential of population growth. In this sense we can achieve a basic moral compass in which many things are considered good or bad, for example: murder, theft and vandalism could easily be considered bad without the need for justification and charity, help and respect being good qualities that can be the goal is to achieve a utopian society, or at least an early form of society. Along with technological advances, we see more complex moral issues emerging, one of the most popular being euthanasia, the practice of intentionally ending a life, most often due to suffering. In many cultures, we see individuals morally obligated to keep anyone alive as long as possible. In Judaism, a person who is brain dead but whose body functions independently of cognitive functions is still considered alive. From a utilitarian perspective, one could argue that keeping a brain-dead corpse alive is a waste of resources that could prolong the life of an individual who can function to a greater extent than a brain-dead patient. brain death. Keep.