These are many controversial opinions on human and animal subjects. Is this fundamental in psychological research? To understand why we are the way we are, we must use human subjects to understand how we behave in a certain way, but this must have moral standards. Animal and human research, they play many roles in learning and understanding certain human behaviors. As Gould stated, scientists speculate that additional examinations on animals could lead to more knowledge and understanding in their study of suicide, because they believe that basic studies on these animals will allow them to better understand the fundamental mechanisms underlying biological phenomena. Scientists would consider using animals because they are much simpler than humans. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay There are many problems with using animal and human subjects for research purposes. The scientists turned out to be very unethical. For example, the Zimbardo Prison Guards Experiment which took place at Stanford University in 1971 by a psychology professor, Philip Zimbardo. According to Haslam, this experiment aims to study the destructive behavior of groups of men over a certain period of time. The students were placed in a simulated prison and then randomly assigned roles, they were assigned as guards or prisoners. The experiment ended after only 6 days. For what? I think being in uniform and having the title "guard" gave them power and made them brutal. They assume it was natural. Another example is the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, also known as the largest notorious biomedical research study in United States history. This study has been conducted for over 40 years. This experiment involved approximately 600 black men; 399 had syphilis and 201 did not. They were misled and did not receive proper treatment. Various rumors have circulated about this study and people are more reluctant to participate in biomedical research, as Katz stated, 60 percent of the black participants from Tuskegee, Hartford, Birmingham and San Antonio, in their study, had heard of Tuskegee syphilis. study. With this information, researchers seeking participants should create a welcoming environment when recruiting new participants for studies (V. Katz et al., 2008). The Tuskegee syphilis study and the Zimbardo prison guards' experiment would not be accepted by our society today. From what I understand, the reason this was allowed at the time was because it was new, no one had done anything as important as these studies before. Tuskegee Syphilis did not have informed consent and participants were not informed of known dangers. They were denied treatment and were not given access to curative treatment, even if it was accessible. The experience of Zimbardo's prison guards was more psychologically violent. Zimbardo failed to be a psychologist but rose to his role as a prison superintendent. We are now more regulated and have the technology to prevent these things from happening. These are three agencies involved in reviewing experimental research; the Institutional Review Board (IRB), the Office of Research Integrity (ORI), and the CommitteeInstitutional Animal Care and Use (IACUC). According to Eissenberg, APA regulations and federal laws require the IRB to analyze every human participant in the research project. People working in the field of psychology have codes of ethics that provide guidance for research and the IRB is there to help review proposed experiments. They all follow APA guidelines for animal and human subjects. The IRB provides protection to human research subjects from psychological or physical harm. It was created in 1974 by the National Research Act. As Enfield and Truwit noted, the IRB was created to help ensure the protection of human subjects because there is a prolonged history of unethical research. It is therefore the top priority of this study. The committee is responsible for protecting it. These are many requirements to consider before submitting your study. First, you must complete a human subjects training course. Next, you need to have the appropriate documents, including consent forms and IRB review forms. When you submit your study, an IRB member will assign it to an applicable review type and verify that all documents are submitted and completed. If a full study is necessary, it will go through a screening process. The purpose of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) is to ensure the welfare of animals by providing regulations and protocols ensuring animal care. This team is made up of a doctor of veterinary pharmacy, a scientist with experience in research on animal subjects, and a community member. The IACUC is important because animals have been mistreated forever. The steps to submit to the IACUC are to complete your proposal. Training is also required, in this case it will be Collaborative Institutional Training (CITI) it will provide you with information on animal care. According to Silverman, the IACUC will then review the proposals and decide whether or not they can use animal subjects. If a submission does not meet the changes to the standards, clarification is required to approve the study. During the approval process, IACUCS reviews regulations and guidelines for administering the use of animals (Silverman et al.). All animals should be protected under the IACUC, but because we don't know the precise number of animals that are used. The Office of Research Integrity (ORI) reviews research abandonments. It is located in the Office of the Secretary of Health and Human Services. ORI helps coordinate public health services and research reliability. They help develop procedures to prevent research misconduct, conduct investigations into studies that have been reported, and provide programs that educate scientists about research fraud. This is an important program because they aim to crack down on allegations of unethical conduct. When reviewing a misconduct report, they will review important documents. Once the surveillance review is complete, they write a report to determine whether the allegation has been corroborated. Naturalistic observation involves observing subjects in a natural environment. It can help psychology, but some human participants are also needed. Our technology also advances and improves natural observations. According to Mel, there is an audio recorder called EAR that records snippets of your daily life. The EAR allows researchers to study the.