Forms are linked in a complex relationship with particulars, known as Methexis, where particulars participate in forms. Plato further approaches his theory of forms through the argument of forms against particulars. According to Plato, forms are general and universal definitions, while details are specific and different marks. He states that a single shape ties together many details. Therefore, Plato argues that details are always inferior to forms. Since particulars participate as forms, particulars derive their distinctive characteristics from forms. This idea is expressed through the expression “one over many”. To understand Plato's theory of forms, we can think of the example of the horse. The “form” of a horse applies to all horses, it’s the most perfect abstract example that comes to mind. However, an individual horse is a particular, changing and imperfect object. The “chivalry” or shape of the house is immutable. Therefore, Plato concludes that the forms are the most important and that they are more real than material.