When you think about the movie Holes and the book, there seem to be many similarities and differences. The film Holes by Andrew Davis and the book by Louis Sachar are based on a boy named "Stanley" who steals a pair of shoes and ends up in a juvenile detention center in the desert. This place requires the boys to dig a whole lot every day using their shovel as a measuring device. They also need to watch out for dangerous creatures like yellow-spotted lizards when digging their holes. The movie Holes by Andrew Davis and the book Holes by Louis Sachar are a little different but the movie delves deeper into the characters' backgrounds and the overall story. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay To begin with, the major difference I noticed after reading the book and watching the movie was that Stanley in the book was presented as being overweight. A schoolboy who was bullied. In the movie, Stanley was a skinny kid and the movie made no mention of him being bullied. This makes the book and movie a little different because in the book it seems like Stanley might not be able to defend himself at the camp and might not be able to complete his daily tasks. This totally changes the way Stanley is perceived. Another difference I noticed is that Sam, the Onion Man in the book, was killed by Trout Walker while he was with Katherine. In this part, Katherine and Sam were on her boat when Trout came and killed Sam. In the film, Katherine hears the steamboat Trout heading towards Sam. Katherine watches from her school where she teaches and sees Trout pull up on Sam's boat and kill him. This could change Katherine's feelings and anger towards Trout. Trout is jealous of her relationship with Sam and the fact that she loves a poor black onion farmer over the fact that he is a rich white man. In the film, when Stanley and Zero are taken by the lawyer to leave Camp Green Lake, it begins to rain as they stand outside. They broke the curse of Stanley's great-great-great-grandfather and the dry desert receives rains after many years. This happens because they found the chest full of treasure that "Kissin Kate Barlow" had left behind. In the book, the rain starts while they are in the car and about to leave. Also, some similarities I found were in both versions of the story, the boys had to dig holes using their shovels as a guide. Using the shovel, they made holes as deep as the shovel was high and as wide as they were high. Camp Green Lake in both versions was a scam that the owners of the property came up with to find Kate Barlow's treasure. They used the boys as slaves to dig each day, so the caretaker ended up hoping that one of the boys would find the treasure or clue. Stanley also found “KB” lipstick for Kate Barlow. This happened in both versions and Stanley had to put it in as a clue. In return, Stanley didn't have to finish his entire day and enjoyed extra shower time. In both versions of the story, early one morning, Stanley and Zero find a chest marked "Stanley Yelnats". Stanley does not give the treasure to the guardian because it has his name on it. The lawyer helps by saying that the safe rightfully belongs to Stanley. Additionally, an important difference near the end of the story is when Trout Walker finds Kate. In the book,., 4(1), 58–69.