The argument presented in Manifesto for Silence by Stuart Sim is to campaign for the conflict in war against noise and the preservation of silence. Stuart Sim writes that silence helps us retain our humanity and self-esteem, explaining how noise pollution is responsible for victimizing silence – our quality of life. Sim uses various methods to convey this message to his readers in a way that makes it easy to understand and follow. He presents his argument and provides elements of credibility. It also allows for the introduction of unfavorable points of view to which he can respond, thus reinforcing his ideas. Moreover, it even goes so far as to suggest corrective measures to resolve the problem. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay Sim introduces the topic of his argument by providing an overview of the destructive nature of noise pollution. He believes that noise is directly linked to technological advances in modern advertising. Providing evidence demonstrating that as technosciences continue to flourish, so should our ability to think and function fully as we humanly should. This raises the importance of Sim's campaign to silence the threat to our sense of humanity...pun intended. Sim refers to the root of the problem as technology. He goes on to support his claims that, through a combination of technological advancements and corporate ambition, advertising has earned its place as the "worst offender" in the assault on silence. Additionally, the health of our physical, spiritual, and mental states is at stake due to the weaponization of sound. Sound bombs are considered inhumane and ideologically intimidating. Sim's "shock and awe" factor turned out to be a real problem. Sim intelligently develops his argument intellectually and methodically for the reader. He asks indiscreet questions, giving free rein to self-evaluation; wondering if it is worth living in a noisy society while gaining corporate superiority. Are we willing to take this risk at the cost of ruining the “natural rhythms” of our human existence? Along with his questioning strategy, he introduces counterarguments and evidence. He notes that technology is a positive marker of society's evolutionary progress and that even silence has its downsides. This method allows Sim to rebut with reinforcing arguments, such as discussing how these technological advances have harmed more than they have helped and considering them "inhumane." He counters the downside of silence with a study done in a hospital, proving that silence has healing qualities. Additionally, Sim's action plans to mitigate the problem are obvious. On the issue of outward silence, he cites a credible recommendation to apply the “60/60” rule to avoid pain. For a broader solution to noise pollution, he references “Operation Silent Night” to control unnecessary noise and adds the legislative efforts of the Noise Abatement Act. When it comes to internal noise, it encourages using silence for deeper reflection and exploration of our personal identity. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay The significance of Sim's thesis proclaims that noise pollution is the adversary of silence. It hammers home the idea that silence is more of a need than a desire, both for a society.