Maybelline, Axe, Dove, Colgate, Pampers, etc. These everyday products are the cause of millions of animal deaths around the world. The products that consumers carelessly rub on their hands and hair, or dress their babies with, were first used on animals. Simple trial and error, over and over again, to get to exactly what people do to perfect their products. Animal rights have been a controversial topic for many years and are still an issue today. Debates over whether this was humane enough. Greek physician-scientists such as “Aristotle and Erasistratus experimented on living animals.” Greek doctors conducted animal experiments to better understand “anatomy, physiology, pathology, and pharmacology.” More than 100 million animal deaths have been caused by testing alone. Animals of all kinds are shocked, burned, blinded, and even starved simply so that scientists can test human products on them. Many believe that the benefits of animal testing outweigh the harms because it means fewer human lives are at risk. Several countries like “Austria, Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany have also banned the use of animals in cosmetic testing” to make the testing a little more humane, but the issue still remains relevant. . Animal testing should not be allowed; It’s not accurate, it’s cruel and unnecessary. The overall question is: Is animal testing really worth all the cruel and intimidating deaths? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay There is countless evidence proving that animal testing does not mean products are safe for use on humans. Animals are different inside and out, and although they are similar to humans in some ways, they are ultimately different. The Food and Drug Administration reports that ninety-two percent of drugs approved for use in humans have failed to pass the necessary tests to actually be used by humans. The FDA's goal is to protect public health from harm. This includes potential hazards such as cosmetics, medical devices, medications and foods. It is proven that even if something is safe for a monkey or rabbit, it is not acceptable for humans. Many will argue that animal testing should be allowed because it will reduce the risk of losing a human life and that a human is worth more than an animal. Animal research has contributed to the discovery of certain solutions to diseases and new medicines, such as the discovery of insulin extracted from the pancreas of dogs. However, even if people were unaware of the feelings of a laboratory rat, the results of laboratory experiments cannot be denied. In a test where there were ninety-three different reactions linked to forty-three different drug molecules, only nineteen percent were observed when used on animals. It is too risky to allow humans to consume or use drugs that have not yet been fully discovered. Another argument is that some animals share a significant percentage of the same DNA as humans. Studies show that genetically, chimpanzees share ninety-ninepercent of their DNA with humans, and mice, ninety-eight percent. The belief that all mammals are descended from the same ancestor leads to the belief that the organs and body systems of these animals are the same as those of the human body. The biggest risk scientists take is not using imperfect products on people, but it is believing they can replace a human with a small furry mammal. It completely defeats the purpose of these experiments if eighty-one percent of the side effects do not show up in animals but do show up in humans. A drug called thalidomide was used in the 1950s and 1960s as a sleep aid and to treat morning sickness during pregnancy. However, it has caused many thousands of babies to be born with malformations, such as phocomelia, a congenital deformity in which the limbs are severely underdeveloped. It was tested on animals before being distributed to pregnant women in many different countries and was even advertised as being completely safe and that the creators couldn't find a dose high enough to kill a rat. Even though this is decades old, it doesn't change the fact that scientists still take the risk of assuming that something safe for animals will be safe for humans. It would be just as cruel to harm a being who has not even been born. There are several products that may not affect a pregnant animal, but will affect a pregnant woman and her unborn baby. A standard test on pregnant rats can only identify about sixty percent of harmful or dangerous substances that can affect a baby's development. The cell tests themselves have one hundred percent accuracy in identifying harmful substances. Even if hundreds of tests were performed on a pregnant rat, cat, or monkey, some things just wouldn't be visible. If a scientist were so sure that all the effects on a rat were the same as they would be on a baby, they would be putting even more lives at risk than if they were simply tested on a human. Earth has given us so much, for us to repay it by killing creatures and testing them for no essential reason is just cruel. Earth is home to many beautiful and unique organisms. Poaching organisms for selfish reasons can lead to loss of biodiversity, which ultimately harms humans as well. People depend on animals to survive, whether for food or shelter. People should not rely on animals to satisfy their own selfish desires. In 1959, Russell and Burch introduced the three R's: it's not about reducing, reusing and recycling; which is a commonly known expression for reducing the amount of waste produced. They introduced replacement, reduction and refinement. Replacement means avoiding or replacing the use of animals. A complete replacement would mean avoiding the use of animals altogether and relying solely on human volunteers, human cells and tissues, and computer models and simulations. Partial replacement involves using animals, but only animals that are not considered capable of feeling pain, such as invertebrates. The pharmaceutical industry is the largest user of drugs, constantly developing new and improved drugs without the use of animals. They use molecular biology, computer simulations and robotics to screen and choose other potential drugs. Reduction means minimizing the number of animals used in each experiment.Scientists can share data and resources with other groups to reduce the number of animals used. They may even share the same animals so they can all study the effects of a drug they all use. Rather than using thousands of rats for several different chemicals or drugs, only a few rats should be used to study the products scientists are working on. This method allows us to collect more information about each animal to be maximized. If the number of animals used is too small, the results will not be very reliable and additional tests will need to be carried out to fully collect the information. On the other hand, if too many animals are used to test the same product over and over again, animal resources and lives are needlessly wasted. The goal of reduction is to do more with less. Refinement means “minimizing the pain, suffering, distress, or lasting harm that research animals may experience.” Refinement is not only beneficial for animals, but it is also better for scientists, as the level of stress placed on animals can permanently change the results they provide. Animals and humans are given anesthetics before surgery, and painkillers are given afterward. The same should be done for the animals being tested to minimize suffering. Painkillers may not save them from all the suffering they will have to endure, but at least they will die in a more humane way. “The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) reported in 2016 that 71,370 animals suffered during experiments without receiving anesthesia for relief, including 1,272 non-human primates, 5,771 rabbits, 24,566 guinea pigs, and 33 280 hamsters.” It is clear that the smaller the mammal, the more it is tested. It is not because an animal is smaller that its life is less valuable than another. They feel the same pain and suffer from the same conditions. Improving their living conditions is called “environmental enrichment”. Dogs, rabbits, rats, etc. are all very social animals. They should be kept in groups so that they have the opportunity to socialize. When not in use, they should be given toys to play with, comfortable homes to live in, and a healthy diet. All animals should have the right to live properly to increase their pleasure. In vitro tests use cells and tissues in petri dishes to test how the cells react. This method could be used for testing chemicals, drugs, skin products and toxicology analysis. “The development and testing of vaccines – for rabies and polio, for example – has been radically changed and improved through the use of cell cultures rather than live animals. » Studying cells in petri dishes would produce more relevant and precise results because human cells can be used. If there is a faster, more efficient way to get things done, it should be used to save time and money. Microfluidic chip testing uses chips containing tissue from different parts of the body that are connected “by microchannels through which a blood substitute flows, mimicking the pathways and processes of the body.” Many people have donated human tissue so that they can be experimented on. This way it's at least voluntary rather than forced. It also does not cause pain to any living being, as it is not a real human. Companies such as EpiDerm andThinCert have created artificial human skin made from sheets of human skin cells grown in plastic test tubes or wells. The results and information that would be provided through testing on human skin would be much better than on animal skin. After all, the products would only be used on humans. Another alternative method is microdosing, which means you can test a human without harming them. Microdosing involves giving someone small doses of a medication large enough to affect cells but not the entire body or the person themselves. Using this method, scientists can study how a human cell responds to a new drug or chemical. This is definitely a better option because the point of testing on something living is to see what effects it will have. Of course, no rabbit will take cough medicine or use eyeliner, so it's best to test it on a person who will potentially use these products for the "best results." Finally, the use of computer models and human simulations can replace the use of animals. This method uses “virtual human organs, metabolism programs, and other computational and mathematical approaches to study the structure, functions, and reactions of the human body.” It can be used to study and test the effects and uses of new technologies and how "new drugs will react in the human body" without endangering anyone or anything. It can replace animals by making “sophisticated” estimates of the probability that a substance is dangerous. There are human simulations so realistic that they can “breathe, bleed, convulse, speak and even “die”. Students learn “physiology and pharmacology” through human simulations so that they do not have to be injured during an experiment while being able to freely test their skills and new products. If students can learn from this method, scientists can then use it to test a new drug and see what type of reaction it would cause. Using trial and error, they can determine how much of each dose a person should receive or how often they should receive those doses. We are unnecessarily cruel to these animals. These animals spend their entire livesdeprived of love, happiness and joy. Even though they are not human, people tend to forget that they also have feelings and emotions. They feel pain like we can and it's too hard to drop poison in their eyes or burn their skin. They spend their entire lives behind a tiny cage, hungry, unloved and ignored. “US law allows animals to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, drowned, drug-addicted and brain damaged.” No pain medication of any kind should be used during or after any experiment. Although some scientists are willing to use painkillers, many choose not to pay much attention to them. These animals are infected with diseases they would not normally contract, tiny mice develop tumors as big as their own bodies, kittens are intentionally blinded, rats are subjected to convulsions, and the skulls of primates are split open and electrodes are implanted there. . Force-feeding is inhumane, cruel and degrading. Animals are given food down their throats while they are restrained. Their heads are opened so that wires can be attached to their brains, their bodies are.