The political domain has multiple facets and different schools of thought. Among the most influential schools of thought are: liberalism, realism, idealism, pragmatism, existentialism, radicals and conservatives. These schools of thought draw on different worldviews that help shape world politics. This article leans in favor of the political point of view of liberalism. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Chau (2009, p. 2) recognizes liberalism as a political philosophy rooted in two principles: individualism and freedom. The goal of liberalism is to enable individuals to reach the highest possible level through freedom. In this case, Chau asserts that the individual is at the heart of society in which, if given the opportunity to define his own paths, liberalism will take its course. An important concept of liberalism as established by Hobhouse (1944, p. 117) is “truth”. Hobhouse believes that a mature liberalism is based on “the whole truth and nothing but the truth” (Hobhouse 1944, p. 117). A liberalist is portrayed as a person who strives to promote the truth and anything he considers false must be brought to justice. Justice in this case was used deliberately to reveal that certain concepts may be considered false but in reality contain elements of plausibility. A fair hearing of both what the individual perceives as true and what is considered false. helps liberals provide solid evidence for their views. This idea is further reinforced by Gardner (2006, p.2) who states that truth defines the human being and that for human beings to be true they should have the opportunity to make their own choices. In the presentation above, Hobhouse attempts to relate truth to justice in the sense that justice precedes truth. If a situation is judged to be right in terms of truth or falsity, the truth is understood. A liberalist must be fair when analyzing the truth of a situation or person, because some things that seem false may not be false in themselves. furthermore, errors must be given fair consideration, because as they develop, the truth may emerge. The second key idea presented by Hobhouse is “diverging opinion.” A society characterized by liberalism should accept the fact that people are different and have different opinions (Hobhouse 1944 p.119). Therefore, individuals should be allowed to express their opinions without fear of contradiction. Huckfeldt (2002, p.1) attributes democracy in politics to divergent opinions, asserting that public opinion plays an important role in establishing democracy in a nation. Hobhouse states that societies should stop stigmatizing immoral people or denying them the opportunity to participate in important social events, because the person can reform and become useful to society. This statement by Hobhouse reveals the correlation between differing opinions and truth. He believes that once a person has achieved reform, he or she has defined the truth. In this case, divergent opinions help liberals discern who holds the truth. Hobhouse (1944, p. 123) theorizes that a liberal society is one built on the “self-directed power of personality.” The society in which individuals have the power of self-management have freedom. This argument is consistent with the definition of liberalism proposed by Bell (2014, p. 682), according to which freedom is the only component of liberal society. Hobhouse's idea is that peopleshould have the opportunity to define their lives rather than defining it for them. Life is a learning process and what people learn for themselves, they are better absorbed and retained (Hobhouse 1944 p.122). He refutes the concept of moral discipline, stating that it serves as an agent of reversing a person's progress because it focuses primarily on entertaining the people around them. Sometimes external pressure can overwhelm a person and bring them down completely, however, once they are given a chance to rise, they will grow to the full realization of their potential. However, freedom is not predetermined as a right of a society but simply as a principle that requires people to treat each other as rational beings. This concept is related to the concept of truth in the sense that no one can judge a person's behavior as right or wrong and if one judges others this way, the concept of truth will be jeopardized. However, guiding offenders into the proper path to define their path is the foundation of truth. “Organic design” constitutes one of the pillars of Hobhouse’s work (1944, p. 126). Hobhouse summarizes the concept of organic as a set of collective components that work together as a whole. In this case, a society is metaphorically described as organic since it is made up of different people working together. However, for people to work together in society, individual freedom must be guaranteed (Ogunkoya 2011 p.516). By merging individual freedom and societal development, Hobhouse is able to connect the concept of self-directed power of personality and that of organic design. In this case, if a person has defined his self-management power, he is able to join others in development programs. He justifies his decision to link these concepts by arguing that individual rights can never conflict with the common good of society and that there is no personality superior to the rest in society. At the center of solitary society, Hobhouse places the concept of “natural harmony”. He cites the concept of natural harmony as a “sustainer” rather than a conflict-free society (Hobhouse 1944 p. 128). There should be an opportunity through which individuals and society can achieve harmony. The path described here is one that leads to individual development which, in turn, will help society as a whole to develop. For example, people always acquire education individually, but after getting a job, their efforts are used to transform society. However, in order to achieve harmony, individual interest must be respected and free from outside interference (Hobhouse 1944 p.129). Faily (2016, p.5) warns that harmony can be compromised when society is divided into majority and minority classes. Nevertheless, harmony still exists but it requires “caution and coolness of judgment for its effective operation” (Hobhouse 1944 p. 130). In this regard, the concept of natural harmony correlates with the idea of ​​organic design as individual freedom contributes to organic design which further builds a harmonious society. Another liberal idea presented here is the “concept of equality”. It is interesting to note that Hobhouse deviated from his conception of equality from the normal concept of equality before the law to a completely new concept which he called “equality of opportunity” (Hobhouse 1944, p. 131). Equality of opportunity maintains that real inequality of treatment is based on the common good which is "the sum total of social conditions which allow people, or individuals, to achieve their.