“Woe to the statesman whose case for war is not as convincing at the end as it was at the beginning,” is a quote from the famous Secretary of State Henry Kissinger. Conflicts involving war and world order play a major role in today's global environment. World order refers to global circumstances, influenced by world powers, and the system of controlling world events, usually through established international agreements, necessary for the preservation of global political stability. In recent years, high levels of interdependence resulting from globalization have increased the need for a world order. There are two notable types of conflict that pose a danger to sustaining the world in our 21st century world; interstate and intrastate clashes. Interstate clashes here allude, for example, to ordinary warfare, atomic battles and digital battles, a contemporary case of interstate clash being that of the South China Sea; and intrastate clashes, which refer to clashes, for example, common war, guerrillas, coups, fear campaigns and massacres. Another contemporary case of intrastate conflict is the Syrian conflict. Different reasons provoke struggles to maintain world order, including cultural attitudes; behind the recent wave of terrorist attacks against the global community and territorial aspirations; as in the South China Sea and aspirations for power. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay So why do we need a world order? There are several essential reasons why we must maintain an effective world order, both to prevent negative impacts and to encourage positive impacts. First and most importantly, global destruction can occur due to global conflict due to a failure to maintain global order; it could be a means of nuclear or other war, and furthermore, global problems such as warming might not be adequately addressed and thus lead to the destruction of our planet, globalization and a sense of mutualism. Global order is also extremely important and depends on recognizing the economic and social benefits posed by interdependence. This is why States are making efforts towards cooperation leading to exponential growth of international law with a higher degree of respect. As the world's superpowers increasingly rely on maintaining global order, many legal measures have been implemented in direct response to events such as the South China Sea and terrorism, but also as part of a broader acceptance of the need for maintenance. Nations created in 1945 and affectionately called the UN; is the pinnacle of international law and responsible for the unanimous protection of the world order. Its main objective is to provide concrete guidelines on how peace can be established and maintained. Kofi Annan states that "the effectiveness of the UN relies on high-level political support and partnerships between governments", which further reflects the importance of the global order. However, the UN, like many legal responses to threats to the global order, has its shortcomings, with no international body to ensure enforcement if states do not ratify the bills. Like UNCLOS relating to the South China Sea, theinterstate conflict over the disruption of the world order in the South China Sea is both significant and extensive; but why did conflict arise in the region? The South China Sea (SCS) plays a major role in Indo-Pacific geopolitics, bordering Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and especially Vietnam and China . This wide choice of industrial capitals means that the SCS contributes significantly as a commercial gateway for global shipping. This reinforces its relevance as an important economic and strategic subregion of the Indo-Pacific. Where the disruption of the world order arises is because of the competition for the sovereignty of small islands and formations. Create a long-standing source of tension and distrust. The first act of aggression came from China, to no one's surprise. This happened in January 1974; when he forced South Vietnam to leave the Red Crescent Islands. In March 1988, the Chinese navy entered into contact with the Vietnamese navy, resulting in the Chinese occupation of seven islands in the Spratlys and further asserting greater control over distant waters that had previously been considered international. The result of Chinese aggression in the SCS is the dredging of several islands across the Spratly, the dredging carried out by the Chinese piled silt on top of the reefs, raising it above sea level to allow for the creation of an aerodrome of approximately 3,000 meters. in length. This airfield would serve as a base for Chinese air forces which, with the support of their coast guard, could threaten Vietnam and intimidate the Philippines. Various legal measures, more or less effective, have been implemented to repress attacks within the SCS; with the main legal measure including intervention by the United Nations (UN). The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) was a treaty proposed by the Security Council and entered into force in 1994. It establishes the legal framework to balance the interests of coastal states and those of maritime states. ; both economically and security-wise. “UNCLOS establishes the exclusive economic zone (EEZ), a 200 nautical mile zone which extends exclusive rights to exploit marine resources to coastal nations. However, the EEZ was never intended to serve as a security zone, and UNCLOS also guarantees extensive rights of passage to warships and military aircraft.” » said the Royal Institute of International Affairs. This creates an interdependence of nations with obligations affecting all marine areas and activities. UNCLOS is quite ineffective as a UN measure to prevent the disruption of the world order in the SCS region because it relies on universal acceptance like all UN bills and treaties. Although the language of the Convention appears to require both being a party to the Convention and not being a party to the Convention, the Convention does not automatically generate any privileges or liabilities for third party members under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Even though most of the convention is currently applicable as customary international law, the lack of full and universal acceptance of the convention will leave the legal order provided for by UNCLOS without its full effectiveness, thus leaving the institutions of the convention powerless. Other legal measures have certainly been implemented in the region to avoid an upheaval of the world order but have proven to be quite insignificant and therefore ineffective in preventing conflagration or tensions in the region. An intervention.