The NFL and Kneeling: Division or UnityBeyond historical records, Mas existed as a social being. All cultures around the world believe so much in unity for strength that excommunication is seen as one of the most punitive decisions. However, missed goals are common when an essentially unifying factor leads to division. Likewise, a seemingly controversial issue can end up unifying the group. In such cases, society is immersed in endless debates with the aim of maintaining, canceling or at least redefining the factor in question. The recent protest characterized by players kneeling during the national anthem is an example of controversial issues regarding the unity or division of society. This article critically examines the controversy surrounding the National Football League (NFL) regarding kneeling (and sitting among some players) during the national anthem to unmask the unit or division within it. is a partner in the company. Say no to plagiarism. Get Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get Original Essay Kneeling during the national anthem was started by former San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick as a protest against alleged police brutality against black people. men.[1] Calling the brutality racial discrimination, Kaepernick opposed standing for the flag, an act that President Donald Trump did not accept. Therefore, Trump asked team managers to fire players who did not stand during the national anthem,[2] which gave the protest more traction. As more and more players "kneel", a recurring controversy becomes evident. The parties most involved are the NFL and its sponsors, football players, administration and society as a whole. Knowing that individuals are sometimes motivated to perform certain acts when they are in a group rather than when they are alone, it is impossible to create a thin line to label the act as entirely unifying or divisive. A critical look at both sides would, however, offer significant insight. To a large extent, kneeling during the national anthem has deepened the division within society. While Kaepernick's may be justified as a way to air grievances, the impact of the protest goes beyond the personal now that a larger group is involved. Various sources report that the controversy has led to increased polarization.[3] In its simplest form, society will have divergent views on the legality of the act. For example, not standing during the national anthem may be seen as a lack of respect for the nation.[4] This view would be strongly held by disciplined officers and many others who believe that standing during a national anthem demonstrates respect for the state. Such individuals would support any action to defend the land against such disrespect. On the other hand, others would find it fair, either because kneeling is also an expression of respect, or because they believe that Kaepernick and any other individual have the right to choose what to do or not do to safeguard their dignity. If left unchecked, such division would disrupt social order and significantly affect national unity. The team leaders are also torn by a conflict of roles, undecided whether to pledge allegiance to the state by following the president's directives, or whether to retain their esteemed players. Whatever decision is made, thedivision is certain within the teams, which explains why not a single player has been dismissed[5]. It would be easier to tame a disobedient player, but when multiple players band together to support their counterpart, firing them all threatens team operations and puts vast resources at stake. If a team dares, for example, to get rid of a player, civil society will find itself at its neck. Among the actors, some will choose to follow Kaepernick's actions while others will adhere to Trump's advice. This leads to contempt, when a teammate, dear to a kneeling player decides to stand during the anthem. This slowly exacerbates feelings of hatred and significantly threatens team unity. The division among NFL sponsors is also evident. Some feel that kneeling has negatively affected their sales, while others feel that the NFL and kneeling are not to blame. The impact is felt by shareholders who bear the loss. For example, Papa John's attributes its declining pizza sales to its customers' perceptions of NFS, stating that "customers have a negative view of the chain's association with the NFL...The company's leadership NFL hurt Papa John's shareholders.” Knowing that Papa John's is one of NFS's sponsors and advertisers, the division is clear as other sponsors argue that the NFL and its executives should take no blame for the uproar in its players' conduct. One example is Buffalo Wild Wings Inc finding opportunity in the controversy, stating that they "see that many of our buyers and potential buyers watch the NFL" and will therefore do another chicken commercial with the NFL. Amid this controversy, society is divided over whether the players' behavior tarnishes the image of the NFL, which would answer the question of whether the NFL should be held responsible for the suffering of shareholders of the companies involved. . It is important to note the division between legislators and legal society as a whole. One side is campaigning for legal action to be taken against those who do not stand up while others emphasize that those who kneel deserve to be heard. In such a scenario, advocates have been seen interpreting the constitution to suit their interests, and the debate takes the form of gun laws contrary to gun rights. Advocates for the kneelers are quick to point out that Americans view the flag differently while their counterparts believe the act is illegal, regardless of the reason behind it. The difference lies in different schools of thought and how they define good and evil. The average American finds themselves torn between the two, and some feel unrepresented when their elected legislators take a different stance. This view explains John Schnatter's statement that the controversy "should have been nipped in the bud a year and a half ago,"[6] a comment that has had hundreds of interpretations. Overall, kneeling during the anthem has polarized American society. Notably, kneeling can also be seen as uniting society in several ways. To begin, it is important to realize that players of all races participate in the NFL.[7] It is common knowledge that people from all walks of life come together during an aversive event. Although police brutality is not limited to black people, Kaepernick takes on the role of perpetrator of the unimaginable and links brutality to racial oppression. It is his act that prompts the president to ask team owners to fire any player who kneels during..