Happiness is a concept that illustrates the American dream. People do everything possible to obtain the most varied materials and materials that provoke pleasure in each individual, this emotion remaining the ultimate goal. John Mills rightly advocated the pursuit of happiness and upheld the concept that, above all other values, pleasure was the final destination. This is a natural human tendency and Mill's utilitarian arguments strongly support the theory that happiness is above all the most important dream to achieve. Utilitarianism as an ethical theory based on consequences and happiness is a justified moral theory. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay The main proponent of the utilitarian system exists within the framework of the Greatest Happiness Principle. This principle supports the idea that a decision is morally correct as long as it increases and encourages pleasures and happiness. Consider the example of a seemingly happily married couple. The wife of this couple is madly in love with her husband, fiercely loyal and completely happy with her marriage and children. The husband, however, erred wrongly and had a brief but damaging affair beyond his wife's back. By revealing the secret of their past affair, the woman's happy world would be instantly shattered. His pride would diminish, his stability would crumble, and the children would be forced to see a bad side of their beloved father. The husband is no longer unfaithful and the family can easily continue to live happily if the secret is kept. According to the Greatest Happiness Principle, the woman should not be told since happiness is truly the pinnacle of human desires, sparing immense suffering is truly the logical choice and everyone involved remains happy. Although autonomy is often a positive aspect, it does not overshadow the importance of happiness. Opponents of the philosophical view of utilitarianism claim that adherents of this belief system often promote an ignorant way of life. They argue that proponents of the Greater Happiness Principle believe in the theory that "ignorance is bliss." Showing an example that “ignorance is bliss” is an erroneous statement; here is an AIDS question. A utilitarian might rightly argue that being aware of the disorder could increase long-term happiness, as treatments and support from friends and family could greatly help the sufferer combat their illnesses. A utilitarian would also support notifying the victim of the disorder in order to prevent others from contracting the virus. An unconscious HIV carrier spreading the disease to other helpless individuals would not increase the happiness of the majority; Utilitarianism is clearly not an ignorant way to live if you look at it in light of this example. Without happiness, other opportunities and necessities lose almost all their importance. A true utilitarian supports only concepts that promote the highest levels of pleasures and encourages only actions that promote true happiness. Utilitarianism allows for the emotional side of life but only requires that the principle of greatest happiness be followed. Any truly honest human being naturally follows such a request every day and decisions are made based on the greatest level of happiness. If the greatest level of happiness is achieved, the greatest majority of people benefit. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now..