Discussion on Whether College Athletes Should Be Paid . Many people claim that they have full access to prestigious 4-year universities and have a big name for themselves, which can more likely lead to greater opportunities than other students. Some of these kids come from nothing and most of the time they don't have time to work because of practices, workouts and studies. Say no to plagiarism. Get a Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get an Original EssayThe NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) does not allow any athlete to profit off their own name while the NCAA makes millions of dollars thanks to these children's names, but they don't see a single cent of the money made thanks to THEIR names. While it's understandable that they can't pay all 460,000 Division 1 athletes, it should be illegal for them not to profit off their own name. Although there are many good reasons for athletes to be paid. There are also many understandable reasons why they don't get paid. People view the NCAA as a lucrative monopoly and the schools don't really care about the well-being of the students, they only care about the money. Years and years have passed since the March Madness tournament began and over the years the NCAA has made over billions of billions of dollars, but no athlete has been able to see the money they have made from his name. College coaches make $10 million to coach and get all kinds of bonuses when they win, and the athletes get nothing for it. Although the NCAA has more than 460,000 student-athletes, they still generate enough money to pay for it. athletes' money. In March alone the NCAA has a tournament called March Madness for the basketball playoffs and in that month alone their revenue skyrockets and they make $933 million from media fees , ticket sales, corporate sponsorships and a proliferation of anchor television commercials. around a three-week basketball tournament. The NCAA only keeps about 4 percent of that money for organizational operating expenses. Even if they pass the law it could take years to perfect, there will be many trials and tribulations just like every new experience and schools, coaches. Players and the NCAA should get used to it. On the other hand, many people think the rule should stay the same. Many people accept the fact that these kids don't get paid and there are many good reasons why they shouldn't, but the main point is that they get a free education. These people see it as if they are already being “paid” with a grant rather than with money. Education is something very important, but nowadays there are many ways to succeed without a degree, such as sports, social media and even entrepreneurship. Although having an athletic degree is a great plan to fall back on if you get injured and your career is shorter than expected. While studies show that with an education, 73 percent of young adults with a bachelor's degree worked full-time, year-round in 2014, compared to 65 percent of young adults with high school degrees (Smale, 2017). This shows that there is a better benefit to getting your degreeuniversity, because you have a better chance of succeeding. Many people say “they get paid with an education,” which is statistically very valuable in life. With this college degree, you can build something great in your life beyond sports and improve yourself as a person, which many people don't have. These athletes are already enjoying free access to a better future and that is something people should consider. thinking when they debate this topic. NCAA athletes are not allowed to accept even the smallest amount of money from a coach, former coach or NCAA official. For example, not even 50 cents to buy a candy bar at a local gas station can be given to athletes or maybe you are on the bus with your team and you stop at a McDonald's somewhere and it t's the first time you've eaten all day and you have ZERO DOLLARS in your bank account, your trainer still won't give you money for a meal. For example, on March 21, 2012, a Kansas State senior named Jamar Samuels was suspended indefinitely because he contacted his former AAU coach, Curtis Malone, and demanded $200 for money for groceries. Samuels doesn't come from money, he comes from nothing, just like most college athletes. He contacted his trainer in desperation to be able to eat and his trainer was the only person he could count on to help him financially. Things like this in the NCAA are what people try to fight against. Something as small as a candy bar can ruin a player's life. If they accept gifts as small as this, they can have an entire scholarship taken away from them, depriving them of their exposure to Scouts and their education. The rules do not necessarily have to go straight to paying athletes, but one step at a time, such as accepting gifts, could be considered permissible. Some say that giving salaries to players can cause dilemmas between players in the locker room and on the field. For example, let's say you look at the all-star team Duke had last year with Zion Williamson, RJ Barret, Cam Reddish and Tre Jones. All four were considered 5-star recruits in high school (rankings are 1-5) and when they all got to college, they had their own hype, respectfully, but of the 4, Zion and RJ had the most hype. Now let's say you offer Zion and RJ the same amount of money of $10,000 for the year based on that hype and you offer Tre and Cam half that amount, Tre and Cam might look at that and say “wow, I was a five-star recruit like them.” , I deserve the same amount of money as them. Ultimately, this could tear a team apart because they might want to show what they're worth. As Brandon L. Wilson said in an article: “This will lead to missed blocks, missed opportunities, and less chemistry between the team as a whole. . This can also lead to players leaving the team. Something like that wouldn't be good for the team's revenue or, more importantly, the team's success. This is a big factor in why the NCAA is afraid to pass the law because of the money it would lose on views, merchandise and more. Without the money they make from all of this, they won't have enough money to pay the players. Sports like basketball and football are team sports, in basketball you can't expect to win from one player, you have to rely on your whole team. In football,. 2020].

Essay / Discussion on Whether College Athletes Should Be Paid . Many people claim that they have full access to prestigious 4-year universities and have a big name for themselves, which can more likely lead to greater opportunities than other students. Some of these kids come from nothing and most of the time they don't have time to work because of practices, workouts and studies. Say no to plagiarism. Get a Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get an Original EssayThe NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) does not allow any athlete to profit off their own name while the NCAA makes millions of dollars thanks to these children's names, but they don't see a single cent of the money made thanks to THEIR names. While it's understandable that they can't pay all 460,000 Division 1 athletes, it should be illegal for them not to profit off their own name. Although there are many good reasons for athletes to be paid. There are also many understandable reasons why they don't get paid. People view the NCAA as a lucrative monopoly and the schools don't really care about the well-being of the students, they only care about the money. Years and years have passed since the March Madness tournament began and over the years the NCAA has made over billions of billions of dollars, but no athlete has been able to see the money they have made from his name. College coaches make $10 million to coach and get all kinds of bonuses when they win, and the athletes get nothing for it. Although the NCAA has more than 460,000 student-athletes, they still generate enough money to pay for it. athletes' money. In March alone the NCAA has a tournament called March Madness for the basketball playoffs and in that month alone their revenue skyrockets and they make $933 million from media fees , ticket sales, corporate sponsorships and a proliferation of anchor television commercials. around a three-week basketball tournament. The NCAA only keeps about 4 percent of that money for organizational operating expenses. Even if they pass the law it could take years to perfect, there will be many trials and tribulations just like every new experience and schools, coaches. Players and the NCAA should get used to it. On the other hand, many people think the rule should stay the same. Many people accept the fact that these kids don't get paid and there are many good reasons why they shouldn't, but the main point is that they get a free education. These people see it as if they are already being “paid” with a grant rather than with money. Education is something very important, but nowadays there are many ways to succeed without a degree, such as sports, social media and even entrepreneurship. Although having an athletic degree is a great plan to fall back on if you get injured and your career is shorter than expected. While studies show that with an education, 73 percent of young adults with a bachelor's degree worked full-time, year-round in 2014, compared to 65 percent of young adults with high school degrees (Smale, 2017). This shows that there is a better benefit to getting your degreeuniversity, because you have a better chance of succeeding. Many people say “they get paid with an education,” which is statistically very valuable in life. With this college degree, you can build something great in your life beyond sports and improve yourself as a person, which many people don't have. These athletes are already enjoying free access to a better future and that is something people should consider. thinking when they debate this topic. NCAA athletes are not allowed to accept even the smallest amount of money from a coach, former coach or NCAA official. For example, not even 50 cents to buy a candy bar at a local gas station can be given to athletes or maybe you are on the bus with your team and you stop at a McDonald's somewhere and it t's the first time you've eaten all day and you have ZERO DOLLARS in your bank account, your trainer still won't give you money for a meal. For example, on March 21, 2012, a Kansas State senior named Jamar Samuels was suspended indefinitely because he contacted his former AAU coach, Curtis Malone, and demanded $200 for money for groceries. Samuels doesn't come from money, he comes from nothing, just like most college athletes. He contacted his trainer in desperation to be able to eat and his trainer was the only person he could count on to help him financially. Things like this in the NCAA are what people try to fight against. Something as small as a candy bar can ruin a player's life. If they accept gifts as small as this, they can have an entire scholarship taken away from them, depriving them of their exposure to Scouts and their education. The rules do not necessarily have to go straight to paying athletes, but one step at a time, such as accepting gifts, could be considered permissible. Some say that giving salaries to players can cause dilemmas between players in the locker room and on the field. For example, let's say you look at the all-star team Duke had last year with Zion Williamson, RJ Barret, Cam Reddish and Tre Jones. All four were considered 5-star recruits in high school (rankings are 1-5) and when they all got to college, they had their own hype, respectfully, but of the 4, Zion and RJ had the most hype. Now let's say you offer Zion and RJ the same amount of money of $10,000 for the year based on that hype and you offer Tre and Cam half that amount, Tre and Cam might look at that and say “wow, I was a five-star recruit like them.” , I deserve the same amount of money as them. Ultimately, this could tear a team apart because they might want to show what they're worth. As Brandon L. Wilson said in an article: “This will lead to missed blocks, missed opportunities, and less chemistry between the team as a whole. . This can also lead to players leaving the team. Something like that wouldn't be good for the team's revenue or, more importantly, the team's success. This is a big factor in why the NCAA is afraid to pass the law because of the money it would lose on views, merchandise and more. Without the money they make from all of this, they won't have enough money to pay the players. Sports like basketball and football are team sports, in basketball you can't expect to win from one player, you have to rely on your whole team. In football,. 2020].

Navigation

« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Get In Touch