In order to understand universal truth, we must begin by defining truth. Truth, according to the dictionary, is “conformity to fact or actuality; a statement proven or accepted as true. Some will say that there is no real reality, only perceptions and opinions. Others would say that there must be an absolute reality or truth. Some people think that there are no absolutes to define reality. Those who hold this view believe that everything is relative to something else and therefore there can be no real reality. For this reason, there are ultimately no moral absolutes, no authority to decide whether an action is positive or negative, good or bad. Universal truth exists but people will never know it. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essayDespite a person's perfect argument about their truth, people sometimes feel that that person's opinion or action is not right. This feeling can be considered a universal truth. To take for example the paradox of the Court: after instruction, Euathlus decided not to enter the legal profession and Protagoras decided to sue Euathlus for the amount owed. Protagoras argued that if he won the case, he would receive his money. If Euathlus won the case, Protagoras would still be paid according to the original contract, because Euathlus would have won his first case. Euathlus, however, claimed that if he won, then, according to the court's decision, he would not have to pay Protagoras. If, on the other hand, Protagoras won, Euathlus would still not have won his case and would therefore not be obliged to pay. So, both sides of this court are right because their argument is fair and logical and the law is not abolished by anyone. This perhaps leads to the conclusion that everyone has their own reality, but despite listening and analyzing both arguments, one has the feeling that Euathlus is not right and that he must pay his teacher back. money he deserves for teaching Euathlus. This may be a universal truth, what we consider just justice, but even this human cannot know exactly 100%. Despite each person's sense of truth, each human has their own reality, truth and morality. This is why it is impossible to know the truth that pervades every human being. For example, simply taking colors; person N1 sees the book and says that it is blue, person N2 agrees but does not even suspect that the blue color of person N1 can be, for example, green for person N2. Person N1 learned that person N2's green was blue. Maybe only the names remain and the colors change for each human. N1 cannot move into N2's body and know what is happening with his vision. So if humanity can't even trust colors, how can they trust anything else? To take for example the Allegory of the Cave by the Greek philosopher Plato. It describes a group of people chained all their lives to the wall of a cave, facing a blank wall. People see shadows on the wall created by the fire behind the prisoners. Because of the chains, the prisoners can't go out and see the sun, so they think fire is the brightest thing in the world. The prisoners are humanity, the fire (illusion of truth) and the shadows are the illusion of what people see, the cave and the chains are something that prevents people from knowing the universal truth – the sun. What we see we cannot trust because we are "locked" into this reality as are,