Euthyphro's central argument implies that the concept of "good" must be independent of the concept of "God", so that "God must love this who is good because he is good. Grube argues that this implies that God has no choice in the matter. To understand this conclusion, one must first assess how the concepts of "good" and "God" can be independent of each other. other, since they seem to be synonymous in the sense that good is an integral part of the concept of God This poses the first problem, however, if accepted, it will still be necessary to confront the problematic argument that God has. no choice in the matter? There must be a set of rules that govern what is good, regardless of God's opinion, over which he has no control. Although this statement seems absurd, it is possible. that God has no choice in deciding what is good, but must adhere to the rules that govern what is good. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games. should not be prohibited”? Get an original essayThe assumption that the concept of good is independent of the concept of God seems absurd. If “God is good” is a synthetic statement, then the concept of good helps characterize the concept of God. Good must be separate from God to be an attribute of God. If good and God were not independent of each other, the statement “God is good” would simply amount to saying “God is God,” which makes no sense. Most of God's followers have a reason to follow what God wants. If one judges following God because he is good, then it seems that good must mean something other than God for the statement to make sense and for people to follow him. Good must describe more than “what God loves,” otherwise it would mean nothing. If good is independent of God, does that imply that God did not create good, and if so, who or what did? Did good create God? Perhaps God is just a manifestation of the qualities of good. Where, then, do humans get their conception of the good? Although these questions remain, it would make no sense if God and good were not independent concepts. The alternative makes no sense, so the concepts of God and good exist independently. This statement seems to imply that good existed before God and that he did not create good. If he has no choice and did not create good, could there be a power greater than God forcing him to love what is good? Having a standard of good separate from God means that good existed before God. What is the concept of God without the concept of good to define it? He could not have existed before creating good because there would have been no way to understand what God is. However, it seems impossible to imagine that he created good before existing himself. This seems to indicate that God did not create good. For a word to have meaning, there must be a consistent and inviolable rule for its use. It can be assumed that God loves everything in his world. However, this does not follow a standard and therefore cannot constitute a rule. But if he wants to love what is good, God must conform to a conception of good. If He didn't, how would we know what God is and why would we think He deserves our praise and respect? If God had a choice whether or not to love the good, He would still have to love according to a standard. It therefore has independent property criteria: a set of rules. God must follow these criteria. Since the concept of good exists independently of God, the definition of good is not determined by God. Good can define God, but God does not define good. God must therefore follow criteria which are not..