Voting is an integral part of the election of government leaders, without it the subjects of government would, in all likelihood, cause public unrest. It is to prevent these disturbances that an effective electoral system must be put in place in a given government to prioritize the needs of the people. A ranked-choice voting system would be an effective way to elect leaders in Canada because it creates a majority government, promotes a strong two-party system, and creates a large voting base. A majority government could be elected by ranked ballot and would not allow for a minority government and would thus allow for a more controlled government with little conflict when a new bill is passed. a preferential ballot would be used; a preferential ballot would not allow the formation of a minority government. Using the first rankings from the preferential ballot, the voting system should be able to result in a party having the majority of preferences in the votes. If this does not happen and a minority government has the possibility of being formed due to the greater number of votes, the party with the least preference expressed towards it would be removed from the ballet and disqualified from the elections. This process would continue until a majority government is formed. This brings us to a second point: with a majority government, there cannot be a minority government, it is one or the other. It prevents the emergence of a corrupt party so that, even if it obtains the greatest number of votes in its favor, it cannot become the power within a given government. A minority government cannot be formed because the basis of a ranked-choice voting system is completely against it, ruling that a vote resulting in a minority government would be redone. Finally, a preferential voting system would allow citizens, instead of just electing leaders, to elect ideologies. With a ranked-choice system, voters can rank the ideologies of different parties in order of their agreement, allowing them to use ranked-choice voting to allow voters to rank parties based on their preferences and thus create an accurate vote. Since all votes are preferential, the vote pool would be completely accurate as to what the majority thinks about specific party ideologies. This is important because the government must represent the needs of the people and the more accurate the votes, the better the representation of the people's wishes. Second, the use of a preferential voting system ensures that the votes of minority parties are not wasted. Voters who would vote for minority parties often choose not to do so for the sole reason that the opposition is strongly against them. However, those who vote find their vote wasted, as the minority party has no chance of playing a significant role in government. If a preferential voting system were to be used, votes would have to be given to other parties, which would add more votes to the pool in favor of the larger parties to vote for. Finally, the use of a preferential voting system results in little voter apathy because with this system, every vote counts; every vote counts because we can vote against the parties we oppose and for the parties we agree with. We would no longer do anything at the time of the vote, we could add a