-
Essay / The Paradox of Reality in The Taming of the Shrew
One of William Shakespeare's early romantic comedies, The Taming of the Shrew, focuses on the courtship and marriage of two sisters, Katharina and Bianca. While the play provides a somewhat light-hearted commentary on marriage and the supposed roles of husbands and wives, the lightness of the work obscures the underlying thematic development of the deception of reality. The Taming of the Shrew "deftly manipulates the system of mistaken identity...inverting appearance and reality, dream and waking, and the master-servant relationship to create a transformed Saturnalia world" in which the he social order and class distinction are only the results of one's environment (Bevington 108). Illusion is used throughout the work, from various character disguises to the physical setting of the play itself, and the motif is not only used to violate social order, but also to illustrate danger to replace reality with illusion. Shakespeare's The Taming of the Shrew uses illusion both to break down the hierarchy of social roles and to affirm the pitfalls inherent in this approach, particularly in association with the characters Christopher Sly and Lucentio. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on 'Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned'?Get the original essayShakespeare first expounds on the theme of illusion at the enthronement, and his use of this motif in relation to Christopher Sly challenges social constructs of class during the 16th century. By simply changing Sly's environment, the Lord of the House uses illusion to convert the simple tinkerer into nobility, thus calling into question the validity of gaining social status during this time period. The Lord asks his servants: “What would you think if he were carried to bed, / Wrapped in soft garments, rings placed on his fingers, / A most delicious banquet by his bed, / And courageous servants by of him when he wakes, / Would the beggar then forget himself" (Induction.1.36-40). Here, the noble himself questions the importance of circumstances in relation to the social hierarchy and challenges norms of social order by asking, "If Sly can become a lord by wearing the right clothes and speaking blank verses, could audience members elevate their status as well?" (Bevington 109). Indeed, the Lord and his servants dress and surround Sly accordingly, and after some gentle persuasion, Sly himself believes in the very illusion he represents. By presenting Sly as an aristocracy purely due to perception, Shakespeare disrupts the idea of a regimented social order and proposes the idea that a simple change of clothing can alter the class structure within 16th century society . The simple introduction and storyline of Christopher Sly's The Taming of the Shrew provides an external framework for the play in which illusion constantly alters reality. The backdrop to Sly's story depicts Shakespeare's use of illusion and illustrates not just a play within a play, but an illusion within an illusion. Shakespeare “multiplies his devices of illusion by combining two entirely distinct plots, each dealing, at least in part, with the comic inversion of appearance and reality” (Bevington 109). At the induction, the lord of the house orders his page, Bartholomew, to disguise himself as Sly's wife. He says he wants his page "to be dressed in full regalia like a lady... Tell him for me... He behaves with honorable actions/such as he has observed in noble ladies." .. And then with kind, tempting embraces. kisses, /And head bowed in her bosom, /Tell himto shed tears, as if delighted/To see his noble lord restored to health" (Induction.1.105-120). By changing his clothes and behavior, Bartholomew transforms not only from man to woman, but also from page to page. noble, and this deception helps Sly replace reality with illusion. In fact, Sly's "function"... is that of the naive "I have an observer who inverts illusion and reality in his mind." and his purpose in the play is to relay the power of illusion (Bevington 108 The audience is "comically aware that Sly's 'wife' is an imposter, a young page in disguise", and "this is the counterfeiting of roles." is no more unreal than the employment of Elizabethan boy-actors for the roles of Katharina and Bianca in the “real” play” (Bevington 108). similarly, audiences must accept “boy actors” as real women, suggesting that reality exists simply as an illusion that one chooses to believe. Shakespeare plays with illusion both within and outside of his play's constructs to reiterate that social order is only a matter of perception. The character of Lucentio also represents the power of deception and perception in The Taming of the Shrew, both as a means of manipulating class structure and allegorizing the consequences of said illusion. Lucentio changes both his societal role and that of his servant Tranio. in order to win Bianca's heart. He commands: “You will be master, Tranio, in my place, / Guard the house, the port and the servants, as I should. / I want another one to be... Tranio, immediately / Unpack yourself. Tale my colorful hat and coat" (Ii203-08). Tranio consents and affirms to Biondello: "When I am alone, well, then I am Tranio, / But everywhere else your master Lucentio" (Ii243-4). Here, Lucentio not only alters his own social rank by means of perception, but he also orders his servants to do so. Through a simple change of clothing, Lucentio transforms from a relatively high-end merchant into a simple professor of science. school and renames itself Cambio, a term meaning "change" or "exchange". Likewise, Tranio dons his master's robes and instantly gains a higher status, once again forcing the audience to question the validity of the attainment. of social status Through the deception of Lucentio and his servant, Shakespeare proposes that “we [must] understand that social distinctions are mere arbitrary constructs” (Bevington 109). Sly, contravenes societal norms by presenting an illusion in order to achieve his goal. Unlike Sly's fate, which the reader never truly determines, Lucentio's own deception, coupled with his delusional love for Bianca, ultimately leads to his downfall. In the final scene, Lucentio calls Bianca during the bet, but she "is busy and cannot come" (5.2.85). Petruchio remarks to Lucentio and Hortensio: "The three of us are married, but you are both shipped." He then says to Lucentio: “I won the bet, even if you hit white” (5.2.189). Here Shakespeare describes the consequences of the disguise and illusion that Lucentio and Hortensio used to facilitate Bianca's love. Although Lucentio has won the hand of the love he pursued, he ultimately loses it because he cannot control his wife. While Petruchio's marriage is acquired by reality, and therefore considered "successful", Bianca's refusal to join her husband when he calls her suggests that the marriage will be hard for Lucentio, alluding to the idea that this is Lucentio's punishment for his deception. The relationship between Petruchio and., 2004.