In this article, I explore whether there should be a rule prohibiting the use of CEDs in education. I argue first that a rule prohibiting the use of CEDs should exist because their use thwarts the achievement of an internal good of educational practice. One of the goals of education is to learn responsibility, so responsibility is an internal good of education. Using cognitive enhancements will then prevent students from achieving this learning. I then object to the assertion that there should be a rule against taking DECs. I show that, in fact, cognitive enhancing drugs do not counteract the learning of responsibility and that the initial argument is therefore unfounded. First, I will show why there should be rules prohibiting behavior that thwarts the achievement of an internal good in any practice. Imagine that all the people who play with Friends download the game because they find that playing the game stimulates their creativity and they also find it intriguing how they can create words from random letters. Thus, playing with friends can be classified as an internal good, because by simply playing the game, you are . Now with all the technology available today people are using websites such as http://www.wordswithfriendscheat.net/ which give people an unfair advantage in accessing this website and using their resources to generate words from a set of letters. Now, not only does this website offer you a wide variety of words ranging from the longest words to the most valuable ones, the website also offers tips, tricks and strategies on how to improve one's vocabulary and total points. Now, using this website will not only give that person an unfair advantage, but it will also counter... middle of paper... in time. That said, taking CEDs will hinder students' ability to learn responsibility because they will become irresponsible by taking a CED so they can cram at the last minute. CEDs will then falsify responsibility, leading students to become irresponsible, preventing them from growing as responsible students as educational practice aims. I began by explaining how internal assets should be protected against anything that could remotely challenge the reason behind the asset. I then showed to what extent responsibility is an internal good by establishing that the goal of education is to succeed and that the path to success involves taking responsibility for one's actions. Finally, I explained how exactly DEC thwarts the acquisition of responsibility as an internal good of education. So there should be a rule prohibiting the use of CEDs..