Mass murders are defined as 3 or more people killed in the same place and at the same time. There are many characteristics that characterize a mass murder and the person who commits it. Mass murders may or may not be organized. People who commit them usually have common traits, such as a history of abuse, and usually possess certain physical, psychological, social, emotional and sexual traits. There are also different motivations behind each murderer. The killings use a variety of different methods, including shootings, explosives, kidnapping, and chemical weapons. Finally, the death penalty is a sentence that all mass murderers should receive. Mass murderers are a danger to society and should not be allowed to continue their lives after committing their crimes. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay There are two main types of mass murder, organized and unorganized. Organized mass murders include followers, family annihilators, pseudo-commandos, disgruntled employees and hitmen. The first type, disciple killers, follow a leader. Charles Manson and his cult, whom he persuaded to kill for him, are examples of this. Follower killers kill because a leader convinced them to do so. They often won't die at the crime scene like the others and usually won't know the victims. Family annihilator killers will kill their entire family at once. They can even kill the family pet at the same time. These family destroyers are mostly the oldest members of the family and almost always end their lives when they are done killing. Stephen Sueppel killed his wife and four children in 2008 by beating them with a bat. Pseudo-commando killers gather large quantities of weapons such as guns, grenades, and body armor. They have been planning for a long time and "something in his world is not right, and he will 'teach the world a lesson' by his behavior" (Holmes). Stephen Paddock, the man responsible for the Las Vegas shooting, is a perfect example. He used many weapons for this and had planned this for a long time. Disgruntled employees are angry at a workplace after being fired or asked to leave the job for various reasons. They return to their workplace with the intention of killing co-workers and supervisors who, in the killer's opinion, have done something wrong. The final type of organized killer is the hit-and-run killer. This person plants something like a bomb or poison, then leaves. They get very far away before their actions can harm anyone (Holmes). The Boston Marathon bombings in 2013 illustrate this perfectly. The Tsarnaev brothers planted bombs and were able to escape the crime scene before the bombs exploded. There are also unorganized killers which can include scenarios such as gang violence which is not planned in advance, this is a crime of opportunity. Killer types are often closely related to the traits they possess. Mass murders often have a history of psychological, societal, emotional and sexual violence. and they also generally match certain physical characteristics. It can be difficult to identify a mass murderer based on their characteristics alone, because many people fit these characteristics and will likely never commit a mass murder. Physically, “the majorityare white…they are usually older than the typical murderer, often between 30 and 40 years old” (Kleinfield). The reality is that most people in their 30s or 40s who are also white will never commit mass murder. Psychologically, mental illness is a common theme among mass murderers. Dr. Duwe found that of "160 cases of public killings...61 percent had a serious mental health disorder" and "that only 7 percent of people with a diagnosed mental illness could commit something violent in a year » (Kleinfield). This shows how the majority of killers are mentally ill, but most mentally ill people are not violent. Many killers are also socially awkward and do not fit into society. Elliott O. Rodger was known for not having many friends and was diagnosed with a developmental disorder. He then killed 6 people and injured 14 others (Kleinfield). Many killers also suffer from psychological abuse. An example of this is Omar Marteen who killed 49 people at the Pulse nightclub in Florida. Some killers may become violent out of sexual frustration. Elliott Rodger was frequently rejected by women and this is part of the reason he became violent. All of these traits combined can make a normal person become a killer. Each killer has a different motive for their actions. There are 5 main motives for mass murder: power, revenge, loyalty, profit and terror. The first motive, power, is often, but not always, committed by a pseudo-commando. These types of murders occur because a killer wants to exert power over his victims. They are often obsessed with symbols of power, like assault weapons. An example is Julian Knight, who “launched an armed attack on pedestrians in Melbourne, Australia” and killed seven (Fox, 31). In revenge killings, the killer's goal is to get revenge on the people he or she believes have done something wrong. This is common among family annihilators and disgruntled employees. Mass revenge killings can also be motivated by “a grudge against an entire category of individuals,” such as race or gender (Fox, 32). Loyalty killers believe they are protecting their victims from something. An example of this is James Colbert “who strangled his wife out of jealousy, then killed his three daughters to prevent them from becoming orphans” (Fox, 32). Profit motives involve killing people because it will make the killer something. This can be seen if a group of thieves kill all the witnesses, so no one can know what really happened during the robbery. The final motive, terrorism, occurs because the killer wants to send a message. One example is the 2015 shooting at the San Bernardino Department of Health office. A couple shot 14 people and injured 22 others to send a message about radical Islam. The method a killer uses may be linked to his motive. Mass murders are frequently committed by shooting, but there are other methods besides this. Focusing on terrorism, security service MI5 says terrorists can use explosive devices, shooting and close-range attacks, kidnapping, missiles and chemical warfare. Explosive devices can range from suicide bombers and car bombs to bombs planted in a building. Shootouts are the most well-known type of attack and are frequently used by terrorist groups. Kidnapping is also frequently used by terrorists. A group will kidnap several usually innocent people and then execute them all at once toshow their power. Chemical weapons are an extremely lethal method that, fortunately, are not used often. This can involve the spread of toxic gases over a wide area and affect many people at once. People who commit these terrible acts can often face the death penalty. Capital punishment can generate strong ethical and moral arguments on either side. On the one hand, it is believed that if a person kills several people, then he himself should be executed. This is the most logical solution because this person has proven that he or she cannot be a responsible member of society. The opposing view holds that sentencing someone to death makes the jury and judge just as guilty as the person convicted. Many people oppose the death penalty until they are affected by a capital crime. When a loved one is murdered, it can cause strong feelings within their family. Often these families want to carry out the most extreme type of punishment allowed by law, which is often the death penalty. Regardless of morality, there is evidence that capital punishment has a deterrent effect on crime. One study "found that each execution resulted in a significant reduction in the number of homicides." To be more precise, each execution resulted in at least 8 fewer homicides committed and at most 24 fewer (Rubin). This proves that the death penalty is effective in deterring further homicides nationwide. Therefore, one criminal who loses his life can save the lives of 8 to 24 possibly innocent people from the death of homicide victims. The death penalty should be retained because of the extreme cost of holding a prisoner. for life rather than executing them. For state-run prisons, "the average annual operating cost of an inmate in the state in 2001 was $22,650, or $62.05 per day", and federally run prisons were only slightly cheaper, at $62.01 per inmate per day (US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs). That's $1.1 billion spent on prison operations in 2001 alone. That's a huge amount of money tax revenue goes toward. Many people are not happy about paying so much money to keep prisoners who have committed capital crimes. Spending “about $22,000 a year” on an inmate convicted of a capital crime does not make financial sense (U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs). There are moral arguments for this, but it is not possible to argue that large sums of money are being spent in a way that is not obligatory. Some elements of the justice system currently do not use the best methods to determine whether or not a person will receive the death penalty, but this does not discriminate against minority groups. . It's not about corruption, it's just about not using best practices. Some states like Arizona provide for aggravating circumstances in their legislation. These are circumstances within a crime that can elevate it from a non-capital crime to a capital crime. There are 14 aggravating circumstances which include gang ties, previous serious offenses or the fact that the life of someone other than the person murdered was put in danger (“Penalty of death or life imprisonment "). The death penalty should not be taken lightly and should also be permissible. many crimes. These aggravating circumstances can be extended to almost all murders, making almost all.