Looking at an orphanage elicits feelings of compassion and empathy. Nothing else. And this is exactly why these organizations provide the ideal disguise for terrorist financing. An NGO that helps provide water to African children would seem harmless on paper. But that's exactly where you could see it. This would not exist in reality. Even if it did, the donation money would not translate into clean water. It would instead be used for something much more sinister, providing funds to terrorist groups. This jeopardizes the integrity of charities and encourages terrorist activity. Nonprofit organizations (NPOs) that appear most at risk typically perform acts of service in close proximity to active terrorist threats. The NPO sector in the global community is vibrant and providing assistance to millions of people. There are five identified categories of abuse and risks towards NPOs, as outlined by the FATF (Financial Action Task Force). Embezzlement is an important method in which actors within the NPO or foreign partners are responsible for the embezzlement. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essayThe second category involves NPOs or official leaders maintaining an affiliation with a terrorist entity; either knowingly or unconsciously. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have also been used as a front for recruiting terrorist groups, making them the third category. The fourth classification includes abuse of programs in which the resources were genuine but the programs they were used for were illegal. Finally, some terrorist entities use false representations to deceive others. They present themselves as fake NGOs to encourage donors to provide support. Countries in Africa have been shown to experience higher instances of terrorism financing through NGOs. This can be attributed to the fact that a number of terrorist groups are present in the region, such as Al-Qaeda and ISIL. The resilience of the Al-Qaeda network results from its ability to disseminate its communications and diversify its financial and recruitment networks. Similarly, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) operated its global logistics network through numerous non-profit affiliates and charitable organizations. Ultimately, as different as their goals may be, terrorist networks and NGOs exist in the same global environment and focus on the same population. Humanitarian NGOs often wish to access populations who are in contact with local or foreign conflicts in order to carry out their activities. good job as terrorist movements seek to gain access to the population in order to aggravate the forces of conflict. Most of these cases of financing of terrorism through NPOs are identified thanks to information from public whistleblowers, audits of existing NPOs and NPO candidates, collection and analysis of declarations mandatory requirements for NPOs, as well as web analysis and terrorism watch lists. Disrupting these organizations involves refusing to register NPOs, suspending their activities, imposing financial sanctions, freezing their accounts and prosecuting them. While low-impact businesses are often disrupted by minimally intrusive measures in NPO operations, high-impact businesses.