The Reign of TerrorThe Reign of Terror was a radical event during the French Revolution with Maximillen Robespierre and Jean-Paul Marat. This event, depending on opinions, could be justified, unjustified and above all justified. This period saw numerous executions, as the government sought to reduce their problems. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayAfter the execution of King Louis XVI, hostilities with various European powers and immoderate divisions within the National Convention propelled the French Revolution at its most violent peak. and turbulent phase. In June 1793, the Jacobins seized control of the National Convention of the Increased Life of the Girondins and instituted a series of radical measures, which included the establishment of a new calendar and the eradication of Christianity. They also unleashed the bloody Reign of Terror (the Terror), a 10-month period during which suspected enemies of the revolution were guillotined by the thousands. Many murders had been carried out on the orders of Robespierre, who dominated the draconian Committee of Public Safety until his personal execution on July 28, 1794. The reign of terror could be justified. Before the Reign of Terror, the king and queen of France were found guilty, by Robespierre, of treason by attempting to travel to Austria to gather an army against the rebels. This is how the National Assembly was born. The National Assembly, led by Robespierre, was designed to give equal rights to all. The National Assembly was a new form of government, created to ensure that all men in France were equal. Also, to resolve financial problems, France being in debt and poverty increasing. The Civil Constitution of the Clergy was drawn up, according to which the clergy and nobility were now to have the same things as the rest of the population, uniting all estates into one. The letter from Vendée to the National Convention expressed that the government was losing badly to the rebels. This is seen in the lines: “Without these departments [lack of troops], this unfortunate region would have fallen into the hands of the rebels today.” These documents show that the government was losing to the rebels, with their internal and external threats, which caused the government to take extreme measures, thus justifying the reign of terror. The reign of terror might also be unjustified. During the time of control of the National Assembly, they created the Declaration of Human Rights, created to guarantee the rights of the people, but they created loopholes. In document A, where some of the rights declared in the Declaration of Human Rights. The ninth right clearly states that “Every person is innocent until proven guilty…”, in other words, everyone has the right to a fair trial. However, in Document D there is a bar graph showing the number of people executed with or without a trace. The number of people executed without trial was around 1,200 accused people, who could have been innocent. This makes the reign of terror unjustified because Document D contradicts what is said in Document A, showing that the government was unjust and corrupt. Furthermore, the National Assembly continued its corrupt ways. They also abolished the monarchy, which was the form of government desired by most of France, so the National Assembly did not apply itself to the demands of the majority. Furthermore, the National Assembly was known to be composed.