The discussion of immortality by Socrates, Cubes and the like in Plato's Phaedo no one is immortal or not. Socrates argues that the soul is eternal because of the idea of remembrance, the argument of “opposites,” and the idea of affinity. The affinity argument holds up well, but the other two arguments only suggest that the soul existed before, not that it will exist forever after. On the other hand, the contradictions of Cebes and Simmia who use analogies based on concrete scenarios better present the soul as an entity vulnerable to death than the body. I conclude that Socrates' theories of "opposites" and memory can provide temporary immortality for the soul, but that the soul is not eternal. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get an original essay The immortality of the soul would suggest that the soul would exist after a person's physical death, which is either an opportunity to enter the afterlife or even possess another person for another life. Socrates' idea of reminiscence states that a person does not "learn" during their lifetime, but rather remembers knowledge they had forgotten, suggesting that there was a past life at the time. during which she experienced this knowledge. Thus, the soul must have existed before the person was born. The conclusion of Socrates' "opposites" argument is that the souls of the dead exist somewhere. Both arguments only suggest that a person can remember past things and that the dead of the past exist, but that the soul itself is not described as immortal. Socrates' argument for the immortality of the soul due to remembrance may explain a person's ability to know something through intuition or prior knowledge, but this is not related to the soul's potential to live forever. The soul may have existed before a person was born, but it is unclear what will happen after that person dies. The argument Cebes makes through his analogy with the weaver can explain the possible outcome of the soul, as well as the memory. The Cebes analogy suggests that the soul can live a finite number of lives, just as a weaver can weave a finite amount of cloth before dying. The possibility of multiple lives gives the memory its potential, but eventually the soul must expire, while the memory alone cannot explain why the soul should have lived instead. Socrates explains that the soul has a special unity with the body. Simmias discusses this particular link between the lyre and harmony. Harmony itself is an invisible entity, while the body and the bow are the physical components. However, since the lyre must be played to reproduce the harmony, there is a vital connection between them in which if the lyre were destroyed, the harmony would cease to exist. Likewise, the quality of the body can have a huge impact on the quality of the soul. In this case, Socrates' affinity case, in which he argues that the soul cannot be "dissolved" or "dispersed", may contradict this argument; However, the fact that the soul is immortal due to its potential resemblance to other invisible things as the gods do only argues for good individuals who can meet sufficient criteria to do so. But there will be people whose lives can be manipulated by physical desires, which can result in the destruction of the body and therefore, in this context, the destruction of the soul as well. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.Get a Trial..

Essay / The discussion of immortality by Socrates, Cubes and the like in Plato's Phaedo no one is immortal or not. Socrates argues that the soul is eternal because of the idea of remembrance, the argument of “opposites,” and the idea of affinity. The affinity argument holds up well, but the other two arguments only suggest that the soul existed before, not that it will exist forever after. On the other hand, the contradictions of Cebes and Simmia who use analogies based on concrete scenarios better present the soul as an entity vulnerable to death than the body. I conclude that Socrates' theories of "opposites" and memory can provide temporary immortality for the soul, but that the soul is not eternal. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get an original essay The immortality of the soul would suggest that the soul would exist after a person's physical death, which is either an opportunity to enter the afterlife or even possess another person for another life. Socrates' idea of reminiscence states that a person does not "learn" during their lifetime, but rather remembers knowledge they had forgotten, suggesting that there was a past life at the time. during which she experienced this knowledge. Thus, the soul must have existed before the person was born. The conclusion of Socrates' "opposites" argument is that the souls of the dead exist somewhere. Both arguments only suggest that a person can remember past things and that the dead of the past exist, but that the soul itself is not described as immortal. Socrates' argument for the immortality of the soul due to remembrance may explain a person's ability to know something through intuition or prior knowledge, but this is not related to the soul's potential to live forever. The soul may have existed before a person was born, but it is unclear what will happen after that person dies. The argument Cebes makes through his analogy with the weaver can explain the possible outcome of the soul, as well as the memory. The Cebes analogy suggests that the soul can live a finite number of lives, just as a weaver can weave a finite amount of cloth before dying. The possibility of multiple lives gives the memory its potential, but eventually the soul must expire, while the memory alone cannot explain why the soul should have lived instead. Socrates explains that the soul has a special unity with the body. Simmias discusses this particular link between the lyre and harmony. Harmony itself is an invisible entity, while the body and the bow are the physical components. However, since the lyre must be played to reproduce the harmony, there is a vital connection between them in which if the lyre were destroyed, the harmony would cease to exist. Likewise, the quality of the body can have a huge impact on the quality of the soul. In this case, Socrates' affinity case, in which he argues that the soul cannot be "dissolved" or "dispersed", may contradict this argument; However, the fact that the soul is immortal due to its potential resemblance to other invisible things as the gods do only argues for good individuals who can meet sufficient criteria to do so. But there will be people whose lives can be manipulated by physical desires, which can result in the destruction of the body and therefore, in this context, the destruction of the soul as well. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.Get a Trial..

Navigation

« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Get In Touch