After reading the title, I can get a good idea of ​​the article that the author is trying to convey. As the title talks about the effect of automatic adaptive corrective feedback on L2 English question, the author has provided enough evidence to support the title. As an example, in this article the author had mentioned some of the effects of automatic adaptive corrective feedback. First, the author mentions that students' desires for corrective feedback can have an impact on their responsiveness and, finally, on the usefulness of the latter. Additionally, the article shows that corrective feedback can impact how students use L2 English probes, particularly if an opportunity to produce modified results is provided. However, there are still many effects mentioned by the author in this article. Additionally, the article had to use descriptive words appropriate for the title. It contains a keyword used in the original copy and should characterize the idea of ​​the investigation and can help people search for the article or study and include them in the title. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay The sources of this article are all reliable, credible and also trustworthy. Why do I say that? Indeed, the article contains verifiable and verifiable facts. All studies, interviews and research done by the author are real and come from some of the authors who have already done the same research. For example, whenever there is research or study by another author, the author will clearly state the author's name and the title of the article as evidence to support the content. Moreover, the author had provided the references at the end of the article. A reliable article includes references so that the reader can confirm the realities and make their own decision. The references provided by the author are articles from government organizations, books and articles in well-known magazines, studies and reputable academic reports. Additionally, the review contains real data rather than cherry-picked letters from disgruntled sources. In this article, the author conducted an experiment on adaptive corrective feedback and at the end of the experiment, this article will provide the experiment result to the readers. Research is being conducted to find out whether adaptive corrective feedback benefits the second language. the learners. The hypothesis tested by the researcher is that second language learners who receive adaptive feedback are able to develop their language abilities than learners who receive static corrective feedback. The learners were divided into two groups, namely the experimental group and the control group. The number of correctly formulated questions and the usefulness perceived by the learners of the feedback given are recorded. Two computer exercises were designed for testing. The researcher concluded that adaptive feedback is more effective in second language learning. Based on the case study done by Dmitri Leontjev, the point I agree with is that learners receive corrective feedback through dynamic assessment (DA). DA is defined as a mediated phase of learning that provides greater insight into students' learning abilities than unaided performance through problem solving under adult guidance or in collaboration with more competent peers . DA has two main approaches which are the interventionist approach and the interactional approach. The difference between themlies in the mode of mediation proposed during these evaluations (Poehner 2008). In the first case, mediation is standardized and is given in a predefined order, often in the form of corrective feedback ranging from implicit to explicit types. The creation of computerized dynamic tests has given several successes where mediation is ensured automatically. Thanks to DA, it is possible to evaluate a large number of learners simultaneously, to (re)evaluate the learners under uniform conditions and to generate the learner performance. DA assesses students' potential abilities rather than criticizing their abilities and essentially supports students' development by understanding their abilities. Therefore, I agree that dynamic assessment is a way for learners to receive corrective feedback. Furthermore, the second point I agree on based on this case study is that adaptive feedback is effective feedback for learners receiving corrective feedback. Indeed, learners prefer different types of feedback. Adaptive corrective feedback provided to learners while they practice a second or foreign language should enable them to self-diagnose their problems and learn something. Adaptive feedback helped learners become more aware of their errors and produce more correct responses. With this feedback, teachers are able to see if the required structure is within their learners' Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) or if additional instruction is needed. This feedback is engaging feedback because it engages between learners and teachers. It is also progressive and interactive as it encourages learners to think and talk more in class. Therefore, I agree that adaptive feedback helps learners receive corrective feedback. On the other hand, the point I disagree with based on this case study is that only corrective feedback plays an important role in whether learners receive corrective feedback. Indeed, not only is corrective feedback important for learners receiving feedback, but teachers also play an important role in providing feedback. Amrhein and Nassaji (2010) suggest that teachers should modify their learners' feedback preferences if those preferences are not beneficial to their learners' feedback. One way the assessment or tutoring system is used in this study, or another similar one, could help teachers discuss performance profiles with their learners, so they can see how they are performing. Teachers can help learners identify their errors so that they do not have difficulty finding their own errors. This can therefore lead learners not to repeat their mistakes. Additionally, teachers should ensure that learners engage in challenging and reasonable tasks that stimulate their thinking and motivate their learning efforts. Teachers must identify learners' strengths and weaknesses at the individual and group level so that they can succeed in the classroom. Therefore, I disagree that corrective feedback only plays an important role when learners receive corrective feedback. According to the article, the difficult point we discovered after further research is that the generalizability of its result might have been affected due to several limitations of the study. After calculating the total number of participants, the fact that the pre-test, post-test and questionnaire were not completed by everyone..