There are some abortion laws that do not allow the abortion of children at 24 weeks for the sake of the mother's life. In Spritzer's abortion law it is stipulated that abortion cannot be performed if it endangers the life of the mother. If a mother decides to have an abortion, it must be done with the approval of a doctor. Taking medication to miscarry is also illegal. Now, if we think about this logically, does he actually condone live abortion? In other words, is he claiming that the baby must be alive in order to miscarry? If an abortion is performed, the baby should at least be dead if that is even an option. I do not condone abortion in any way, but there are some circumstances where it could be excused. For example, in cases of rape, incest and when babies have an abnormal case in which they have died or will not survive outside the womb. But even then, the women in these cases continue to give birth to their babies and are the joy of their lives. Even if they have been carrying it for more than 18 years in their life or only 5 minutes after birth. How could a woman abort something so beautiful and admiring, that the same blood that runs through her veins runs through her babies like