In Jules Howard’s article “The “grieving” orca mother? Projecting emotions onto animals is a sad mistake,” the author explains this view of the concept of animals possessing emotions. He begins by explaining recent documentation of a mother orca mourning her dead calf and questions the validity of the situation, unsure of whether animals actually carry emotions. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Howard uses the article to proudly promote his novel and his study in the area of ​​animal grievance. He lists evidence of animal grievances, such as police dogs mourning their officers, and even horses burying their kennels in hay. In Howard's eyes, this form of animal burial and mourning rituals is not the animal equivalent of a funeral. Despite the differences between humans and unicellular prokaryotes, there is a common similarity in the basic necessity to reproduce and breathe, whether aerobic or anaerobic. Humans share many similarities with orcas, such as having different languages ​​and cultures and simply being the largest of mammals. All these similarities and the idea of ​​these whales having emotions is not even taken into account? This story may be of interest to non-scientists because it is heavily opinion based. The idea of ​​animal emotions is often underestimated and considered less important compared to their genetic makeup. Animal genetics is of interest to scientists because further research on animals could potentially help humans in the future. Howard's article completely counters movements protesting animal abuse and exploitation because these movements emphasize the fact that animals have feelings and feel pain just like humans. The author continually lists reasons against his argument and ends the article by stating that all animals should be respected. Decisions must be based on evidence. Data must be collected and analyzed in order to support a point. Howard's indecisive statements and insufficient evidence for his argument may appeal to non-scientists, as fiction appeals to many. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay The article is interesting in the sense that it is a very explicit point of view that many people may be afraid to address due to its controversy. Our canine counterparts are considered "man's best friends" and this emotional attachment that humans have developed over years with animals can make Howard's point of view difficult to understand. Still, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but Howard's article may apparently have more traction in the debate. org as The Guardian claims, because it is more accessible to non-scientists.