According to Aristocracy of Manufacturers, which from Democracy in America, Tocqueville mainly discussed how scientific manufactures bring people to aristocracy. He separately discussed the potential harms of the division of labor and the differences between the new aristocracy and the old. In his mind, the division of labor expands the rank between workers and masters, because workers only pay attrition on specific work processes, which limits their views and thinking abilities, but the Masters consider an extensive vision of production more than workers, which forces masters to control. more social capital. This phenomenon tends to the new aristocracy. Furthermore, he argued that this new aristocracy is different from the old one, because the relationships between masters and workers are built through social benefits, meaning that masters only pay workers for producing goods. , and that masters have no responsibility towards workers outside of society. working hours. In the old aristocracy, the workers belong to the masters. Masters are responsible for the lives of workers.2 To show the potential harms of the division of labor, Tocqueville presented an example of making pinheads. He believed that a worker who makes pinheads for twenty years would do nothing but make pinheads. The reason is that in the process of division of labor, the pinhead maker only thinks about doing his job, work limits his ideas and views. In this situation, the worker does not belong to himself but to the work. Tocqueville maintains that this mode of production causes workers to lose the general ability to apply their minds to the direction of work. He supports his argument on the example of workers who spent twenty years making pinheads. It's in the middle of a paper. He has no free time to rest and conclude a social contract. Some of them even have a problem with depression. Another problem as Tocqueville said, a new aristocracy is emerging in society. It is widely reported that many private business executives spend money, such as buying a lot of luxury goods, but just pay workers the minimum wage. These leaders are colder toward workers, such as firing employees, who produce lower benefits; they don't care about the living situation of the workers. I learned that five young employees committed suicide at a Chinese company that formerly manufactured telephone products. The fact is that it is difficult to stop this new aristocracy. The reason is that this group of people controls the production of necessary goods that are so close to our lives; ordinary people “support” this wealthy group. The rich have economic power and the ability to expand their empire.