Humanity has always had a special relationship with what is considered “exotic”; From the days when the Anglo-Saxons maintained zoos for dark-skinned individuals to the period in the 1800s when elephants were highly sought after as personal pets, kept for pleasure, the controversial question of whether whether the action of obtaining such “items” was raised. » is immoral or right, both for the owner and the victim. Although the action of owning an exotic pet is appealing, many negative factors come into play when the population is able to own these exotic creatures; From neglect to the dangers of extinction, the negative consequences of exotic animal ownership dictate a ban on private ownership of exotic species, as they are indeed not pets. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay Due to the ease of access to obtaining these exotic creatures, there is a cycle of abuse that the pet must endure when the owner discovers that they have neither the ability nor the resources necessary to take care of it. The first passage, "Prohibit the ownership of exotic animals", introduces the fact that big cats, such as Bengal tigers, are "relatively inexpensive to obtain", which is then expanded in the second passage, "Allow cats”, which states that these exotic animals from foreign countries are sold at the same price as “thoroughbred dogs”. Because of this easy availability, man's "innate fallibility" leads to his inability to take responsibility for a wild animal, which is supported in the second passage as the reader is told that often, sometimes, these Pets “end up with people who are not fully prepared for the responsibility that this type of pet entails. Even if these new owners do not want to do so, they often "become, in effect, abusers", due to their inability to "dedicate the time and resources necessary to care for the animal" or their inability to have a standard living space. , leading to the “decrease in [the animal’s] quality of life”. Often, because of this awareness, the owner then attempts to sell their cat, "getting rid of their [exotic animal]", but these zoos generally do not want or need more tigers because they already have their quota for the exotic. cat filled. Advocates of private ownership of exotic animals may claim that in some areas, "exotic cats may live well" and that "some wealthy individuals dedicate large tracts of land" to the resources associated with owning such animals. exotic; however, the fact that these individuals are the exception since only "some owners are capable" and because "it is possible" for big cats to thrive, illustrates the fact that most of these exotic animals end up in a home to neglect, therefore emphasizing the fact that there should be no licenses for individuals to own exotic animals. Often, these exotic creatures are on the verge of extinction because there are a greater number of individuals purchasing and abusing these species than there are animals living in their natural habitat. For example, India, home of the Bengal tiger, has only "2,000 Bengals, or 5% of what it had a hundred years ago", while in the United States, with the exception of zoos, there are approximately “12,000 private Bengals”. .” This stark contrast in numbers represents the low population..