Journalism is an essential part of the democratic world. Without truthful information, our democracy would not work at all. It is therefore problematic to witness a questioning of classic journalism. This comes from the fact that in today's modern society many web-based media have appeared, more easily accessible to younger generations and free of charge. The problem with these media is that they are freely accessible to everyone and therefore end up being more exchanges of opinions than cold facts. If that means you can't rely on web-based media, and therefore the typical newspaper reporter is the most truthful and reasonable, then how can you explain the decline in newspaper readership? This is what journalist Samuel Rachlin tries to explain in his debate article "The suicide of journalism" from 2009 published in politics. Samuel Rachlin believes that the culture of murderous society has become extremely superficial. Nowadays, people no longer pay attention to serious journalism, on the contrary, entertainment programs and reality shows have taken on much greater importance in the news, 'Time is drowning in reality shows,' X Factor', 'Dancing Madness' and a culture, where superficiality and introspection become the highest measure of success and quality He points out below that we see that newspapers, just like television and the Internet. "We quickly agreed that the industry. wasn't doing very well anywhere in the world. In fact, it's going to hell. In the beginning... the newspaper business... had reporters, editors, commentators and television producers. Later, mainstream newspapers described him as a harmless guard dog, "the guard dog chose to surrender and lay on his back like a cuddly dog ​​with kicking paws and wagging tail. Blog me. In this way he manages to make his arguments clearer and more accessible to the reader And he manages to make the language more tense and more lively. but above all it is the ethos and the logos which are his focal points As mentioned previously, he begins by reinforcing his own philosophy by making himself accessible to the reader. Moreover, his ego is quite strong, since he is himself. journalist and writes for a newspaper The reader thus has the idea in advance that he knows this subject quite well. As the form of presentation becomes more objective, Rachlins uses the form of appeal to logos more..,