blog




  • Essay / Why school is bad for children in Vietnam

    The education system may vary by country, but is always a considerable concern for almost all people in the world. Thus, numerous debates are underway around its role, its function or its effectiveness on a global scale. According to John Holt (1969), “school is bad for children,” meaning that general schools have a deleterious effect on students. This is still considered the current educational situation in Vietnam. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay First of all, it seems that Vietnamese schools focus on too much theory for students to understand and apply to real life. In reality, high school students all have to learn dozens of different subjects such as mathematics, literature, biology, geography, etc., all of which have an enormous amount of detail in the textbooks. According to Professor Nguyen Xuan Han, “current curricula are harming students” as almost half of the information in textbooks appears useless. As a result, students will quickly become desensitized to what they learned in school and will inevitably forget this knowledge. Additionally, unreasonable and practice-lacking curricula prevent learners from applying the information in their books to real life. Since they are unlikely to practice in schools, they may jump to the conclusion that “learning is separate from life” and gradually lose the passion for learning. Second, most Vietnamese schools are teacher-centered rather than student-centered places. , which probably leads to a poor student perspective. Teachers are not there to satisfy students' curiosity about the surrounding world, which they have already aroused before going to school, but to introduce them to the knowledge and subjects that seem important to them. Students are quickly led to assume the importance of certain subjects and to have an obvious bias in their favor despite their inadequacy. For example, in Vietnam, several disciplines such as mathematics, literature and foreign languages ​​have more sessions (three to five per week) than others (one to two per week), which certainly leads students to believe that these subjects are very popular and most important. In the event that one is bad in “the three most important disciplines”, one will consider himself a slow and mediocre learner, in which case he will set the limits of his own abilities. It is undeniable that the importance of separate subjects cannot be compared with each other and the abilities of students should not be judged on the basis of their grades only in certain disciplines. However, what matters in most Vietnamese schools is what teachers think is important and what they want students to know. Similarly, the lack of interaction between teachers and students and the mechanical nature of conventional teaching methods stifle creativity in learning subjects. students in Vietnam. Although some claim that curricula, teaching methods, textbooks, etc. are renewed for better learners, the fact is that only a few significant changes have been made. Teachers continue to provide knowledge designed in curricula rather than based on student desire. Students are expected to remain silent during classes instead of being encouraged to freely express their ideas and discuss with their peers. In..