blog




  • Essay / The connection between the novels Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro and 1984 by George Orwell

    How does 1984 reflect Never Let Me Go? These two literary masterpieces have things in common and reflect on each other from many different points of view, but how?Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get the original essayThere is social stratification, from the most powerful to the weakest. On top of the pyramid is Big Brother, whose function is to serve as the line of sight for everything. Members of the Inner Party (upper class), then members of the Outer Party (middle class) and finally the Proletarians (lower class). We can observe another group, but isolated from this classification, which is the mass of slaves, from the equatorial lands, who constantly pass to the winner. The sacred principles of Ingsoc: Newspeak, doublethink, the mutability of the past. He felt like he was wandering in the forests of the seabed, lost in a monstrous world of which he himself was the monster. He was alone. The past was dead, the future was unimaginable. What certainty did he have that a single living human creature was at his side? And how could we know that the Party's domination would not last forever? In this society, there is no religious alienation since religious practice is prohibited. The descendants are unaware of the strength they possess and the party members are blinded by their dominant ideology. There is inequality between classes in relation to the goods they own. own, we see that the offspring barely had food, while the members of the Inner Party enjoyed all the privileges that the other classes did not possess. There are also inequalities in social status, due to belonging to a certain sector of the Party (internal or external) or because they do not belong to it as descendants. The only difference that is not found in this society is political differentiation, since there is only one party, there are no differences. There is also no social mobility, horizontality which includes migrations, it cannot be given because the three powers, reflected in the book, are in a state of permanent war. The vertical, if possible, because it does not depend on the goods one owns, but depends on an examination (which was carried out at 16), from there we can deduce that there is no has no descent or transgenerational filiation, because membership in these three groups is not hereditary. Power is exercised by the Inner Party, with Big Brother being an image projected for people to focus their attention, dedication and fear. The only ability the outside world has is to obey orders from above. There is a total management of the population that encourages them to think and remember what Big Brother says, a society that lives in fear and terror, that has no mental capacity to discuss, confront and they had it, they were killed. A totally alienated society, from which they have stolen their ability to decide. A sad, disconcerting and harsh story that analyzes from an almost cruel point of view memory, family ties and the invisible pains that support the possibility of a future. For Ishiguro, the future is a recombination of small terrors and hopes into a much larger perception of the culture's ethical and moral identity. Above all, the novel raises all sorts of questions about what we consider ethical, moral, and the invisible suffering of transgression. The result is a distorted mirror in which the notion of the individual and contemporary solitude is reflected from a dark perspective. There is nothing simple or..