blog




  • Essay / The Case for Drinking Age - 531

    Do you think young people should drink alcohol? Mainly the percentage of people who drink in America. Can our young people stop students from drinking? Yes, because we can stop the effects of alcohol. This subject is not unanimous. The enactment of the National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 prompted states to raise their legal drinking ages. Publicly purchase or possess alcohol under age 21 or risk losing millions in federal highway funds (GPO Access). We need to stay 21 years old to drink because a younger age of 18 or younger results in medical irresponsibility, reduces the youth percentage, and reduces crimes from 18 years old. Most people agree that lowering the MLDA 21 would be medically irresponsible. . We should save the drinking age because it indicates that alcohol interferes with the development of young people who go to bad people who go to prison. It is clear that people consumed alcohol to prank others into drinking alcohol so that they could be sufficiently stupid in their responsibility to themselves. Also, secondly, it makes adults commit suicide, kill other people, or make things risky for themselves. The fact tells us that it can cause violence to innocent people and not victims (Birckmayer). In conclusion, thinking about alcohol, it is its violence that breaks the law. Another reason to prevent young people from drinking is that MLDA 21 reduces the number of underage drinkers. Most people agree that since the program began, the percentage of underage drinkers declined in 1984, when most of the MLDA 21 laws had an impact on crime. It was about reducing crime to make things safer with less alcohol. Scientific studies indicate that when 21-year-olds drink less, it becomes less risky and calms down. This fact is that age 21 drinking less leads to less suicide-related crimes (.Fell). In conclusion, consuming less alcohol can save many innocent lives from suicide or poisoning. Although some people think it's okay to let young adults drink alcohol because MLDA 21 is not statistically associated with lower crime rates. According to the 2002 Legal Drinking Age and Social Problem meta-study, 72% of studies found no evidence that people aged 18 to the drinking age killed themselves or themselves. would have committed suicide. This fact indicates that there is no evidence of alcohol consumption at the age of 18 (Wagenaar). However, they were wrong because the lower levels of MLDA 21 to 18 will irresponsibly allow more of the population to drink alcohol to commit crimes..