Shaw, in his teens, was when one rainy morning he crossed the line of a Utah highway, hitting a car containing two scientists, James Furfaro and Keith O'Dell, who were traveling to work nearby. Both men were killed. Shaw says he was texting his girlfriend at the time. We then see him participating in something almost inconceivable. He enters the scene of the accident and he meets one of the scientists' daughters, where she was being interviewed, and he receives a warm, sincere, tearful hug from this woman. . Reggie Shaw has had a long, difficult journey from being a reckless killer to becoming one of the nation's most powerful spokespeople on the dangers of texting and driving. He was first attracted to New York Times reporter Matt Richtel, who had a series of articles on distracted driving that even won a Pulitzer Prize. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned"?Get the original essayNow, five years later, the book "A Deadly Wandering" has been written, Richtel gives Shaw's story the emotional processing that was needed, going into detail about the science behind distracted driving. Continually, Richtel's much-publicized book deserves a place alongside a book like "To Kill a Mockingbird" in American high school curriculums. High school students of this generation need this kind of book to inspire them to possibly save a life or two. What makes the people who died in this book so different and so touching is their ordinariness. Two men get up early in the morning to go to work, they get behind the wheel, a stranger loses track of his car and they crash. Both men die. There is a possible temptation to make the accident more dramatic than it really was, to make sense of it, which is why Richtel wonders if Reggie lied about being texting and driving. In short, the chapters of the book are divided and Richtel narrates them and relates them to the history of cognitive neuroscience. Since its origins in World War II, it has also helped pilots and radar operators save lives and not become overwhelmed by the technology available to them. To subsequent brain MRI studies on multitasking. Richtel explains how researchers have discovered that distraction is the opponent of attention, not its opposite. It's a very interesting way of looking at things. He basically says that we are distracted because we want to be. Otherwise, why would they sell so many smartphones? As Richtel explains, “A good gadget is essentially magical, commandeering our concentration with pleasure, surprise and ease. Not all distractions are equal: the impairment from drunk driving, for example, is consistently huge, while the impairment from texting is arguably more serious. intense but of shorter duration. The most powerful question posed by the book "A Deadly Wandering" is very simple: If we know that texting and driving is so bad for us, why do we still do it? Richtel is testing many different ways to describe the rush people usually feel from a phone. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Other examples could be drugs, alcohol, video games, junk food, the fight or flight response to a tap on the shoulder, etc. Richtel describes our body as a slot machine...