Social Analysis: The Art of War Could War Be in Your Own Life? Would this be possible in modern society? Should we kill? Well, war can certainly take place in your own life, in modern society, and it cannot result in death or murder. War is essentially conflict. In the book The Art of War, written by Sun Tzu, he shows that almost anything can be seen as war and that by understanding your enemy you can even approach victory without much of a battle. Many other strategies throughout the book can also be applied to many things in our lives today. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay To begin with, my grades can be considered a kind of war. The enemy would be bad grades and homework and tests would be like battles. In The Art of War, Master Sun says: “Therefore, a victorious army first wins, then seeks battle; a defeated army first fights, then seeks victory” (91). This relates to ratings, because when you have good ratings or a victorious army, then you have won and you look to continue to keep it that way. When you have bad grades, or a defeated army, and you try not to give up at first, then you expect to get good grades. This quote can be interpreted as when you fail, but persevere, you will eventually succeed. In my life, I run around my school every week. Running can also be considered a form of warfare. The enemy could be considered fatigue. The battle is the course of the race. Since fatigue eventually traps you and I can't run back, I am on the "dying ground" (151), as The Art of War describes it. According to The Art of War, it is said that "death ground" is "the time when you will survive if you fight quickly and perish if you do not" (151). This means that I won't succeed if I don't act quickly. Li Quan says in the book: "As the classic Spring and Autumn Annals say: 'War is like a fire: if you don't put it out, it will go out by itself' (57 ). This can be applied to running, as stopping is essentially “burning out.” When I “step aside,” it means I’m done with racing. All in all, fatigue will get to me if I don't finish the course quickly, but at the same time I will eventually get tired. If I stop, then my enemy, fatigue, has got me, so I just jog and then keep running to succeed. War can also be part of our social interactions. Talking with friends is like talking with allies. People we don't like are our enemies. Master Sun states that “when there is murmuring, neglect of duty, and prolonged talking, group loyalty is lost. » This means that if there is gossip within an army, then it is no longer loyal. When friends gossip about someone, they are no longer loyal friends. However, one should not retaliate and gossip. Master Sun said: “A government should not mobilize an army out of anger, military leaders should not provoke war out of anger. Act when it is beneficial, give up if it is not. Anger can turn into joy, anger can turn into joy, but a destroyed nation cannot regain life…” (166). This means that a government should not go to war because it is angry and a destroyed nation does not return to what itwas before. So, instead of fighting back and gossiping, it would be better to stay calm and act like it's not a big deal, so that you can always have trust among your peers. People who gossip will most likely lose the trust of their peers. Overall, The Art of War depicts our social interactions accurately. Every person in the world wants to be recognized and have a good reputation. Master Sun states that “ordinarily, an army loves heights and does not like low ground, values ​​light and despises darkness” (132). This means that an army likes to be on top of mountains and hills and does not like to be in valleys and plains. They will do better on heights because it is easier to see what is around them. Being recognized and having a good reputation are high places. Being ignored and having a bad reputation is the weak point. People like to be well accomplished and recognized by their peers because it makes them happy. When they are ignored by their peers, they feel depressed. Social interactions can take people to good or bad places, and to high or low places. When they are insulted, they feel ignored and like they are at their lowest. When they are encouraged, they will feel recognized and feel like they are in a high place. So war can take place in our personal lives, but it can also take place in other areas, such as the economy. Businesses and corporations are part of the economy and go to war with each other virtually every day. An example would be the smartphone market. Companies like Apple and Samsung hold a large portion of the market. Their enemies are other competitors, so Samsung would be Apple's enemy. Their allies could be those they associate with. The battlefield would be the market, for example that of smartphones. Releasing new products and updates would be their battle. Companies offer products that are better than each other, but they have almost the same function. According to IDC, in the fourth quarter, the smartphone market was dominated by Samsung at 20% of the market and Apple at 19% of the market. If they both understand each other, they will be able to release products that are better than each other. As they release new products that consumers will buy, they invade deeper into the market, which would be the “heavy ground” of The Art of War. In The Art of War, heavy terrain is when you "enter deep into another's country, passing through many towns and villages" (149). When these companies release new products, but consumers don't really buy them much, then they are in "light ground."(148) Light ground is when you "get into other people's country, but not deeply” (148). As the market is filled with many competitors, companies will most likely try to invade a new market, such as the smart watch market in which Apple and Samsung also compete. By and large, businesses and businesses are equally able to go to war with each other. other. They can retaliate against attacks from others by launching new products and entering new markets in an attempt to dominate and expand. The Art of War provides improvements and recommendations that others and businesses can use to become better. In the book, Cao Cao says: “Don't use weapons because of your emotions” (166). This would mean that you shouldn't fight or shoot someone just because you are angry with them. Many people get angry about something and sometimes they fight. ByTherefore, The Art of War recommends not fighting over simple things, but rather calming down. A person's reputation could be at risk of being destroyed and they might not return to what they were before. For example, when a person trades something with another person, but the trader learns that the person fought with another trader, that trader will likely not accept and run away. The Art of War states that “In battle, confrontation is done directly, victory is achieved by surprise. This means that you should not confront an army, but surprise it. Businesses and businesses should do the same. When companies simply say what they will do next, consumers can easily predict what will happen next and they will know whether what those companies say will succeed or fail. Instead, they should disclose what they say, until the day comes when they fully tell what they have done. By doing this, consumers and other businesses will be surprised. Some companies, like Apple, have used this strategy and it would be a big improvement if other companies used it as well. There are also some limitations that The Art of War has on society. One of them would be that a person cannot go to war with himself. There would be no enemy in this situation. We cannot perceive war on everything either. Some strategies in the book cannot be used in many situations. For example, Master Sun says, “If half their forces advance and half retreat, they are trying to lure you” (136). This can't really apply to any situation because there is no other situation than actual armed conflict, in which you see half of your enemies advancing and the other half of their forces retreating. It cannot be expected that every strategy described in the book can be used in society and in other situations that are not armed conflicts. The Art of War offers many strategies that can be applied to anyone's life. It also describes our society and social interactions accurately. This shows that war can be seen in almost any situation. Understanding your enemy can also help you, so you won't have to fight many battles. The Art of War emphasizes that you must use tactics rather than confrontation and combat. If you are fighting, you must adopt strategies to win. The art of war can also improve lives. It can also help many businesses improve. Although the book and its strategies have limitations, most of the strategies or tactics can be used in life. The Charming Job of Wall Street When a person reads a good book, sees a good movie, or watches a spectacular show, what do they get out of it? Some aspects will stay with them, forever associated with this experience for the rest of their lives. It could be a funny line, a dramatic scene, or a character with an irrepressible personality. Every time I read a book, there is always a particular aspect or character that sticks in my mind. Something about them makes them linger in my mind, setting them apart from the rest. After reading The Big Short, what will stick with me most are the radically unique characters. When it comes to unique traits that set you apart, many of the Big Short's characters fit the bill. However, there is only one whose boss says he likes them and: “I have nothing bad to say about him except that he is a fucking weirdo” (64 years old, Lewis). Such a description is certainly memorable. However, he's nowhere near as memorable as the manhimself. Greg Lippermann had a character that exuded madness and a strangely captivating rudeness that deserved the attention and memory of those who encountered him in the real and literary worlds. The character that Greg Lippmann exudes throughout the novel came to the reader in a unique package. If the only thing people knew about Greg Lippmann was a physical description, most people would not automatically assume that he was a brilliant Wall Street stock trader. The common image of a Wall Street stockbroker does not usually come from a man who sports hair "in the style of an 1820s romantic composer or a 1970s porn star" ( 63 years old, Lewis). It looks like he was trying to achieve a suave, debonair, elegant look that failed disastrously. This would be more common for a comic book character rather than a serious and intelligent businessman. However, Lippmann's success quickly contradicted this theory. Even the wardrobe choices of "loud ties" (63, Lewis) rather than the more subtly neutral colors commonly found on Wall Street, gave the impression of a tall, brash character rather than one more calm and intelligent that customers seemed to expect. when you entrust your money to someone. Then again, Wall Street was described in the book as having been so poorly managed at this point that no one seemed to care who they gave their money to. Given this, it is no longer surprising that this was a man to whom apparently intelligent people entrusted their money, even considering how the meeting with the Eisman group went. Beyond appearances, there is no doubt that Greg Lippermann was a financial force to be reckoned with. However, his personality was another area where it was memorable to the reader, because, as I said earlier, it was best described as "a damn piece of work" (63, Lewis). Whether you met him in real life or through literature, the personality that Greg Lippermann exuded was only part of the personality. cannot be easily dismissed from the mind. Lippermann was a man with a personality that very few people were likely to forget. This becomes abundantly clear when the reader first interacts with him in the novel. When presented as the result of an experiment, "if a team of experts had set out to create a human being to maximize the chances that he would terrify a Wall Street client" (62, Lewis), a certain image begins to emerge. form. The image the reader sees is of a man who does not meet the usual criteria of a successful Wall Street stockbroker. If he's a near-perfect example of someone who was designed to alienate customers, it would be logical to assume that his career would suffer. However, the reader, as well as those who knew him in real life, discover that he is brilliant in his chosen profession. He himself tells us that “whatever his employer had paid him was nothing like what he was worth” (63, Lewis). Lippermann made his clients and, above all, himself a fortune by playing the stock market game. He had a somewhat large head, but despite that, he wasn't a terrible human being. Those who knew and interacted with him in the professional world all agreed that "he simply evoked extreme feelings in others" (64, Lewis), due to the stark differences that existed both in his character and in his appearance, which differed from what he was. society considers normal. The reactions to Lippermann's personality were certainly strong; however, this..