The norms of a society and the way it operates can be reflected in its legal system. This notion is important for Hrafnkel's saga because it puts Einar's death into perspective. According to Professor Wen, the saga depicts a period of bloody and messy transition from a pre-modern culture of honor to a modern system of law. The legal system of that era stands in stark contrast to the laws and constitutions of today. In the story, Hrafnkel executes Einar for disobeying his orders to refrain from riding Freyfaxi and is accused of murder without due process. There are two aspects of the story that must be considered in determining whether Hrafnkel is guilty or not. First, the importance of speech in matters of agreements and honor. It must also be taken into account that Hrafnkel did not act out of anger or malice since he simply respected the oath he had taken. Considering these points, Hrafnkel is not guilty of the crime of murder. The word and oath taken between two people were crucial to the functioning of society during this period....