The use of genome editing and modification to design and engineer the attributes of future children has been supported and endorsed by the Nuffield Council on bioethics; the report states that it is morally and ethically permissible to use genome alterations to modify the genes of future children in specific situations. But later he said that genetic modification of human beings should be done after checking the boxes of bioethics. Say no to plagiarism. Get Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get Original EssayVarious researchers and bioethicists belonging notably to the United States have reached occlusions just like that of Nuffield's advice, but the reason for their support is completely different. Genetic mutation should only be done to change the genes of babies who are about to be born with serious illnesses, provided no drugs or alternatives are available, not mutate it just so they can get aesthetic changes. The decision in this report goes against a limitless global assertion that hereditary genetic mutations must remain beyond limits, it is a commitment reflected in the laws of many countries, a binding European treaty , some universal affirmations and various popular sentiments. It is clearly mentioned in the report that genetic modification cannot replace medicine. It does not attempt to legitimize hereditary alteration as a method of preventing the transmission of true hereditary diseases; it recognizes that this can be accomplished using existing reproductive systems, for example, the embryo screening procedure known as hereditary or preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Once again, it seems strange for proponents of hereditary hereditary change to raise the possibility of a world in which the rich buy hereditary changes for their children, and to recognize that if widely adopted, this great innovation could “provoking or aggravating social division, or underestimating or hindering groups in the public eye.” Indeed, maintaining a strategic distance from this inevitability is one of two standards offered as a manual for the moral use of hereditary genome-altering intercessions. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Personalized Essay The question that arises is: why would anyone have a genetically mutated embryo if the baby is perfectly fine? So why have the above statements raised questions that already constitute prohibitions? The points raised are generally made in the context of the argument that current denials of hereditary alterations should be maintained and strengthened..