Understanding Civil Disobedience We all encounter at least one instance in our lives where we are told to do something that seems to go against our moral code. Unfortunately for most of us, we will end up doing these things because of an authoritative figure or serious consequences. But what are the implications of standing up for your morals? This is what Thoreau seeks to answer in his essay Civil Disobedience. The following article aims to answer this question in correlation with what Thoreau said about civil disobedience. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay This seems to be a question with another inquiry hidden in it. In other words, at what level is your personal integrity? Of course, everyone objects to some of the things they are asked to do, but ends up doing them anyway. If your morals and beliefs are that strong, you should have no problem opposing a character who forces you to go against them. Then again, perhaps this is an ideal hope. Thoreau believes that every man should defend his beliefs passively. However, he states: “Even voting for the right does nothing for it” (Thoreau 673). Therefore, we must take a stand on something in order to disagree with it. If we are opposed to animal cruelty, let's stop eating fast food. If we don't support the current war, let's take down the flags. Sitting down and just saying you're against something is almost as bad as participating in it. Thoreau also writes: “He who gives himself entirely to his fellow men seems to them useless and selfish; but he who gives himself in part to them is declared a benefactor and philanthropist” (Thoreau 670). This strongly represents Thoreau's beliefs about conformity. A man who indulges the ideas of others and puts his own aside is an imbecile; a man who understands the ideas of others and thus obtains his own is truly wise. Thoreau believes that man has the capacity to create a wonderful civilization, but that we must all do it through our individual means. These ideas of civil disobedience are interesting concepts to wrestle with. Each person at once asks himself: "What if I don't do it?" » Perhaps we should all answer this question and face the consequences as we go. As long as our civil disagreements remain within the realm of modern morality, we should at worst serve only a few years in prison. Thoreau thinks this is actually the best thing that could happen. In fact, it would bring us closer to ourselves to connect with our own inner genius. Of course, most people believe that family is more important than their opinions, which is why this rarely happens. The question now arises: what is more important, family or values? Of course, many will say that family and values ​​are the same thing, but, for the purposes of this point, only relate to personal values, excluding the value of family. Every person tends to stay true to their values ​​and follow them in every moment of their life. However, once a person forms an intimate relationship or family, their values ​​may need to change. In some cases, a person's values ​​will have to completely change simply because they entered into a relationship. This question seems obvious at first glance, that is, many people would agree that family is more important, but Thoreau would say that a real family..