In 2015, the United States faced many tragedies, followed by many new debates and issues. In my essay, I will discuss abortion, a controversial issue in Ohio, as well as many other US states. This is not a new argument, but it has recently become highly publicized. Kathy Gills defines abortion by stating: “Abortion refers to the voluntary termination of a pregnancy, resulting in the death of the fetus or embryo. » (Gills Par. 1). This issue led to the creation of two distinct groups, Pro-life and Pro-choice. Pro-choice groups believe that women have the right to control what happens with their bodies and should have access to the health care necessary to support them, regardless of what decision they decide to choose. Pro-life groups disagree with this view and often view abortion as bad morals or even murder. (Gills Par. 2). This argument persists because without abortion there are many issues at stake, but with it there are also many things that need to be considered. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay In the early 19th century, abortion and abortion regulations were very lenient. These laws were challenged in 1973 in the Roe V. Wade trial. The lawsuit arose when a woman seeking an abortion could not do so under Texas law. In 1857, Texas regulated its abortion law, so that only in circumstances where the mother's life was in danger did the woman, Jane Roe, fight this law. After the Roe v. Wade trial in January 1973, women were given the right to abortion in all fifty states, although this right was governed by different regulations in each state. In the 1973 trial, the court ruled that not allowing abortion violated a woman's right to her own body, but it also ruled that the state had the right to regulate the procedures. (Wilson, paragraph 1). Despite the trial that ended with this verdict more than 40 years ago, controversy over this issue has not ended and continues to arise. One of the main arguments for choice is the need to protect constitutional and natural rights. Jon O'Brien, a member of Catholics for Choice, discusses this in his article "Why We Are and Should Stay 'Pro-Choice'." O'Brien states in her article: "Choice recognizes that the ability to make this decision should not be determined by economic, social or political factors, but by what each woman believes is right for herself and her situation." » (Par.21). The problem O'Brien faces with this quote is the freedom of "choice" only afforded to certain people based on external factors. With this quote, I believe he really wants to convince his audience of the importance of giving everyone the freedom to choose. In his argument, O'Brien believes that our constitutional rights are at stake and that without the pro-choice movement, we will lose the right to privacy that is guaranteed at birth. The purpose of his article is to persuade his audience how important it is to secure our constitutional rights and that it would not be right to take away someone's right to privacy over their own body. Pro-life is the opposing side of the argument, and remains a highly favored option for many. Many factors contribute to the choice to be pro-life. One of the main factors in the pro-life argument is to view the issue from a.