-
Essay / The effectiveness of the Compromise of 1850
At the time of the drafting of the Constitution, the question of slavery had been postponed and kept at a strategic distance, a choice which would later give rise to the debate currently known as the name “American politics”. Civil war. Composition, which was at one time the answer to the problems facing the Union, had the opposite impact during the 1850s, when conflicts and varying interpretations of the Constitution gave rise to sectionalism, the danger of withdrawal, and tensions between the parties of the North and those of the South. States. Northern abolitionists attempted to save the Union while trying to get rid of slavery, while Southerners maintained bondage in the new region and took steps to withdraw; The Compromise of 1850, particularly the Fugitive Slave Act, expanded these beliefs. Say no to plagiarism. Get Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get Original Essay Many changes in the United States were made mainly because of the Compromise of 1850. First of all, California n He was neither a state nor a slave. -one free. This angered the South because they did not want to be outnumbered in the Senate. Utah and New Mexico were also admitted as states and enjoyed popular sovereignty, the only states at the time to have it. Texas was forced to cede some of its land and received $10 million in compensation for it. The slave trade had been banned in Washington, D.C., but slavery was still permitted there. However, the most critical and controversial provision was the Fugitive Slave Act, which proved to cause much dispute and anger from both the North, which opposed it, and the South, which was unhappy that the North did not execute him. Since slavery was not mentioned in the Constitution, there was dispute over whether or not the states had the right to authorize it and extend it to the new territories. Some abolitionists, such as William Lloyd Garrison, argued that because slavery was not enshrined in the Constitution, it was never meant to be protected or exist. Every citizen must be protected by the government, as well as their freedom; however, slaves did not have freedom and were not protected because, as Garrison states, the government was their enemy. According to Garrison, abolitionists must act accordingly, given the fact that the government was doing little, if anything, to abolish slavery. Some radicals like Garrison believed it was better to secede from the Union than to stay in the Union, where innocent blood was shed. Transcendentalists, such as Ralph Waldo Emerson, held similar views. We see in Emerson's speech on the Fugitive Slave Law that laws like this are immoral and that citizens have every right to refuse to obey them, despite the consequences. The law stipulated that runaway slaves had to be captured in the North and even gave a $10 reward to federal commissioners who captured unfreed slaves. He also called on citizens to help these commissioners. Emerson claimed that it was a crime of kidnapping and that it took away the liberties of citizens by making them take away those of slaves. The law posed a threat to the Union and a cause of sectionalism. The only positive thing that came out of it was the spread of abolitionism and awareness of slavery in the North. Some states shared the views of people like Emerson. One in particular is the one in Boston, Massachusetts. As shown in the poster of..