Table of ContentsIntroductionHome Depot Case AnalysisConclusionReferencesIntroductionDiscrimination is a pervasive problem that transcends geographic boundaries and affects various aspects of society, including the workplace. The purpose of this discussion is to explore the transformative role played by Home Depot in reshaping our perspective on discrimination, particularly in the context of hiring practices. In response to a series of complaints, Home Depot designed a solution to redefine the assessment of qualifications and skills, while diminishing the influence of physical appearance through the strategic integration of technology. As technology now permeates every facet of our lives, it becomes imperative to consider how this tool can revolutionize the hiring processes of large companies, like Home Depot. Say no to plagiarism. Get a Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the Original EssayAnalysis of the Home Depot CaseGiven Home Depot's claim that it simply filled positions in accordance with applicants' preferences , we must critically assess whether the company can be found guilty of discrimination in light of the principles set out in the relevant chapter. Home Depot, as the largest home improvement retailer in the United States, has more than 413,000 employees and annual profits exceeding $8.6 billion. Nonetheless, this industry giant is grappling with issues of discrimination within its organizational fabric, stemming from the nature of its work, historically oriented toward male-dominated roles. While Home Depot's operations primarily revolve around DIY projects and labor-intensive tasks, the prevailing philosophy in the modern era asserts that women are equally, if not more, qualified for such positions. The accusations against Home Depot revolved around claims that women were primarily placed in cashier positions, while their male counterparts were given positions in home repair positions. These women alleged that their applications for positions as home repair workers were overlooked because of their gender. In light of the information presented in this chapter and the specific case of Home Depot, one is inclined to conclude that Home Depot is indeed guilty of engaging in discriminatory practices. The company's tendency to hire a majority of male employees for home repair positions despite the presence of equally qualified female candidates is indicative of disparate treatment, defined as "the differential treatment of individuals in similar situations based on characteristics such as color, religion.” , gender, national origin, age, race, or disability status. The company's failure to address minority representation, particularly in terms of gender and race, reinforces allegations of discrimination. This situation is further underlined by the obvious under-representation of women in customer service positions, where they were mainly assigned to cashier functions. Although women may have more experience relevant to cashier roles, it is essential to develop a well-rounded skill set and be able to excel in various positions within an organization. Therefore, the rejection of women for home repair positions, for which they were qualified, illustrates a clear example of discrimination rooted in gender bias..," 3(1), 32-46