In Racheal Opielski's essay “Should Vaccines Be Mandatory?” ", Opielski's main argument for why someone should be vaccinated is the sudden nature of the spread of epidemics. (quote) Opielski therefore believes that to ensure people are protected, compulsory vaccinations must be put in place. However, in a pandemic, vaccines often do not have time to be vigorously tested and tested, making them more dangerous. For example, every year a new flu vaccine is created because the virus changes and becomes different every year. Scientists only have a limited amount of time to test and test these new vaccines before injecting them into humans. Such a short period of time is not enough to see the possible consequences and side effects that the vaccine could possibly have and who could have an allergic reaction. Rushing vaccination often makes the vaccine unsafe and can cause side effects worse than the disease itself. In 1976, an Army recruit died from swine flu. This sparked an epidemic panic in the United States and a vaccine was quickly developed. Due to the rapid development of the vaccine, it has therefore not been properly tested and reviewed. The vaccine caused 532 people out of the 48 million vaccinated to be paralyzed by a disease called Guillian-Barré and another 25 people were killed. risks causing as devastating effects on populations as in 1976. There are countless cases where vaccines that have not been properly tested lead to death and serious injury. If this kind of tragedy were to occur because families were forced to vaccinate their children... middle of paper ... but the consequence inflicted is not the consequence intended or intended)" as an assault. (quote) Therefore, vaccinating someone is considered an assault and if the vaccine causes an unanticipated side effect in the infant, it is also classified as an assault. This is a blatant violation of human rights that should have no place in a civil society where freedom is valued and is a solid foundation on which our constitution was built. In conclusion, it is clear that advocating for compulsory vaccination constitutes a major violation of human rights. rights and should be condemned. I don't think it's fair to not give people a voice in what they want when it comes to medical treatment and to give too much power to the government and health organizations. Anyone arguing in favor of compulsory vaccination has not clearly thought through the health effects, religious oppression and attacks on freedom it represents..