India, a country where the rule of law exists and the third pillar of government i.e. judiciary is considered to be the most reliable pillar among all other pillars of democracy, but questions regarding the most high authority of the highest institution, namely the Chief Justice of India (CJI), before the Supreme Court of India, on the issues of nepotism and abuse of power, raises a very serious question regarding the accountability of courts and judicial machinery in India. Say no to plagiarism. Get Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get Original Essay The allegations were made by Justice J Chelameshwar, Justice Rajan Gogoi, Justice Madan Lokur and Justice Kurian Joseph ( all currently working as Senior Judges of Hon'ble Supreme Court) on the current Chief Justice of India, Justice Deepak Misra, on the issues of selective allocation of important cases to judges subordinate to them, l attribution of the case concerning the mysterious death of Justice BH LOYA, who was hearing the famous Sohrabuddin false encounter case and exercising discretion in sending the cases to the selective benches. These questions were raised when the confidential letter written by these judges to the CJI became public and a press conference was held by these judges. Full details of the issues raised in the 4 judges' letter are discussed in this article. Review of the controversial case On January 12, 2018, four senior judges of the Supreme Court, Justice J Chelameshwar, Justice Rajan Gogoi, Justice Madan Lokur and Justice Kurian Joseph, addressed a press conference and have criticized the administrative discretionary powers of Justice Deepak Misra and his style of distribution and distribution of cases in the apex court. In the very first paragraph of the letter, it was written that certain orders passed by the honorable Chief Justice had adversely affected the overall functioning of the justice system. According to them, certain traditions of judicial administration have been broken after a century. It has also been said that it is a well-established principle that the Chief Justice is only the first among equals, neither more nor less. Justice Misra was also criticized for working according to his own preferences. Two cases of RP Luthra v. Union of India and Supreme Court Advocates-on-record Association and Others v. Union of India have also been mentioned in which the selection of judges was arbitrarily done by the Chief Justice of India. There were also allegations regarding the violation of the memorandum of procedures. The letter was also requested to rectify the situation and take corrective measures in all the facts in question mentioned above, regarding which the current controversy has arisen and questions on the independence and efficiency of the judicial system were posed. Justice Deepak Misra: A Brief Overview Justice Deepak Misra, a legally trained person having Justice Ranganath Misra (21st CJI) as his uncle, joined the apex court on October 10, 2011 and became the Chief Justice of India (45th ) succeeding Justice JS Kehar on 28. August 2017. He was called to the Bar on 14 February 1977 and practiced in the Orissa High Court and the Military Court. He was appointed as an additional judge of the Orissa High Court in 1996 and later transferred to the Madhya Pradesh High Court where he was appointed as a permanent judge on December 19, 1997. Before being appointed to the apex court, he was a judge in Chief of Patna as well as the Delhi High Court. He will retire on October 2, 2018, at the age of 65. Justice Deepak Misra's name is associated with a number of landmark judgments. This includes the famous Yakub memon case,.