Illegal immigration has been a problem in the United States for a long time. This phenomenon is not new and thousands of illegal immigrants have entered the United States through the Mexican border, the Pacific Ocean or many other means. Some people entered the country legally on a visit visa, but then stayed illegally and work in various locations. Illegal immigration is a double-edged sword; On the one hand, this provides the local economy with cost advantages, because illegal immigrants are not paid as much, even though they are more productive. On the other hand, these illegal immigrants do not pay taxes and their employers do not pay their taxes either. There are both pros and cons to illegal immigration and this article will examine some facts relevant to illegal immigration to the United States. “Every day, thousands of illegal immigrants cross the 4,500 kilometers of border with Mexico. According to the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, or INS, the total number of illegal immigrants in America from this source is increasing by 275,000 per year. The United States is already home to an illegal population of 7 to 12 million people, the vast majority of whom are of Mexican or Hispanic origin. These illegal and uninvited guests are self-help to obtain employment, education, welfare, and unemployment compensation. Those whose salaries are paid under the table pay little or no taxes. And they are easy prey for unscrupulous employers and politicians” (Hayes 2000)Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay The U.S. population is growing primarily due to births in minority and immigrant communities. We don't like to think about it - because it's a political correctness issue - but there is a stratification of work, primarily based on education, where difficult jobs in agriculture, manufacturing and services are accepted by those who have no recourse to the private sector. world of white-collar work. Especially when these low-paying jobs don't require language skills, immigrants have historically jumped at these opportunities to get their foot in the door. The unemployed born in the United States don't think first of having any job to get on their feet. They first think about what their salary will be. If you are here illegally, you clearly have a competitive advantage (Howell 2006). Most Americans and their leaders agree that illegal immigration is bad for the country and should be stopped altogether. The Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) is a law of the United States of America that concerns employment policies and regulations. This law was enacted in 1986 for various reasons, including the fact that many illegal employees work in the United States. The two main requirements of the IRCA include: “(1) hire only individuals authorized to work in the United States and (2) not discriminate on the basis of citizenship status or national origin” (LMD 1992). In order to be eligible to work in the United States, workers must complete an I-9 form and must be able to demonstrate to their employer their authorization to work in the United States. “Employers cannot refuse to consider all qualified people with work authorization, whether citizen or non-citizen. Employers must accept any document listed in the INS Handbook for Employers and cannot arbitrarily specify a documentINS nor require additional documents. Employers cannot refuse to hire a qualified worker whose work permit subsequently expires. IRCA imposes back pay and severe penalties on employers who commit immigration-related employment discrimination” (LMD 1992). I support immigration reform because I believe illegal labor is a drain on the United States economy. There are over 10 million undocumented workers (not counting their families) in the (white) United States. Most of these illegal workers are concentrated in California and Texas, although their presence is felt throughout the country. About three-quarters of these illegal immigrants arrive in the United States after crossing the U.S.-Mexico border. Many of these illegal immigrants are hired by U.S. employers as undocumented workers because they can be hired at less than minimum wage. Most of these workers are hired to work in agriculture, manufacturing and construction, or in behind-the-scenes jobs. These workers do not receive any type of health care or other benefits (White). These jobs are mostly opened illegally by American employers in order to save on taxes and also their costs by paying workers less than the minimum wage. This is why I believe it is important that immigration reform be put in place, because it makes it more difficult for employers to cheat the government on taxes, etc. Another benefit that can be derived from IRCA is that of the social costs associated with illegal immigration to the United States. When illegal immigrants enter America, they do so without documentation or authorization. This means that there is no trace of their origin or their journey. They can be infected with a hundred diseases, such as polio, tuberculosis, etc. These diseases can spread and cause many problems for American citizens. Apart from this, there are additional costs for the state as it has to pay for education etc. of these illegal immigrants. “As part of already underfunded programs, they place a greater burden on these services to manage. Republicans reached agreement among themselves on legislation to combat illegal immigration (Carney, 1996). But with their package facing delaying tactics from Senate Democrats and a veto from the president, they ended the week of September 2 uncertain about their next move” (Website). It would be helpful to consider the downsides of implementing strict immigration laws. If the job market wasn't filled with illegal immigrants crossing the Mexican border, these positions would have to be filled by someone else. If we were to bring more agricultural and service workers to the United States through a regularized process, the resulting immigrant body would be less Mexican and more Arab, Muslim, South Asian, and African. For those who want to get an idea of ​​the impact this could have on American society, take a look at Europe. It is a question of culture, language and religion. Author Samuel Huntington (Who Are We?) and others have argued that Mexican culture is not easily compatible with the Anglo-Protestant culture under which the United States flourished. This may be true. but it is certainly more compatible than Iraqi culture (Howell 2006). If the Mexicans weren't coming in illegally, we would have to process and track them all. What the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS, the successor agency) should look liketo the Immigration and Naturalization Service of the new Department of Homeland Security) to process the 500 workers who enter the country illegally daily? How much would it cost? There are approximately 11,000,000,000 illegal immigrants in the United States. Any process other than their total expulsion will result in a substantial increase in the size of government agencies designed to monitor them (Howell 2006). By making such an issue of illegal immigrants from Mexico, we discourage all immigrants from living in the United States, including those we desperately need. The problem is clogging up the immigration system for applicants with math and science skills. Many say the education system is overloaded with the children of illegal immigrants. Yet these skills have not – at least in the last 20 years – been produced by this same system, forcing us to import our technological capabilities from India, East Asia and elsewhere ( Howell 2006).One could argue that immigrants are human beings after all and should not be discriminated against even if they enter the country illegally. Much public controversy has been sparked by the discourse of affirmative action, which focuses on discrimination against immigrants in the workplace. It began as a period of "heated debate that began around 1972 and subsided after 1980, with the latter indicating a resurgence of debate in the 1990s, leading to the Supreme Court's decision in the summer of 2003 upholding certain types of affirmative action” ( Fullinwider 2005). Apart from this, the development, defense and challenge of preferential affirmative action have followed two paths. “One has been legal and administrative, as courts, legislatures, and executive departments of government have developed and enforced rules requiring affirmative action. The other has been the path of public debate, where the practice of preferential treatment has given rise to a vast literature, for and against” (Fullinwider 2005). Many people argue that immigrants are generally a skilled workforce and help increase local U.S. production. Others also argue that when businesses pay them below the minimum wage, their costs go down, meaning production costs as well as prices go down, which helps citizens of the United States. It is also argued that immigrants tend to send their US dollars to their families outside America, which strengthens the value of the dollar, making it more valuable, thereby strengthening the US economy. Yet we find that these benefits are far from sufficient. offset by the costs that illegal immigrants impose on the United States. Many immigrants feel they are discriminated against in the workplace due to one or more types of discriminatory practices that occur within various organizations. Many of these employees are women who feel they have been discriminated against based on their gender. The Revised Order of 1972 made a change that included women among the "protected classes" whose "underutilization" required the setting of "goals" and "timetables" for "full utilization" (Graham 1990 ). Some theories are presented in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which addresses discrimination in employment, even if the employee is an illegal immigrant. IRCA changes all that. An illegal immigrant cannot be considered an employee within the meaning of IRCA, which automatically addresses the problem of discrimination. It can be concluded that immigration reforms are a good 2006).