The fear of a dystopian future explored in both Fritz Lang's film Metropolis and George Orwell's novel Nineteen Eighty Four reflects the values ​​of societies in the time and context of the authors. To the extent that the authors are seen as vectors of their societies and historical period, one could say that 1984 and Metropolis are themselves didactic pieces of history. This is expressed through the way they effectively articulate aspects of life that were particularly valued by Weimer Republic Germany and post-World War II England, as well as through the choices and themes of the authors which result directly from the context in which the two texts were written. no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay The concepts of power and authority within Nineteen Eighty Four and Metropolis explore the values ​​and attitudes of each of the societies from which the texts originate. Metropolis, conceived in the years of the Weimar Republic, expresses the fear of a dystopian future through a corporate totalitarian regime. Germany's transition from an empire to a republic and the shift away from monarchy to a presidency also fostered a fierce capitalist push intended to increase economic profit. This is clearly visible in the absolute capitalist domination that Joh Frederson exercises over the city. 1984 presents a fear of absolute power in domination that is established throughout the novel in mentions of the Party and in the details of Oceania's hierarchical system. These two post-war speculative texts were created to comment on their respective political contexts and previous wars. 1984 particularly focuses on the consequences of the introduction of all-powerful government and the development of socialism as Orwell's fictional system of government. Ingsoc” which means English Socialism and is a commentary on the National Socialist Party in Germany during World War II. The contents of Fritz Lang's Metropolis and George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty Four encapsulate the dystopian vision of power imbalance that was the result of the values ​​and attitudes of the societies from which they were designed. The rapid evolution of technology and its impact on society and politics are central to both Metropolis and 1984 and are often used to represent the shortcomings of the nature of the societies of both texts. Technology is a central theme in the science fiction genre and is extremely important in both Metropolis and 1984. Post-World War I societies were preoccupied with technological advancements spurred by World War I and II , respectively for each text. The policy at work in 1984 summed up this way of thinking in one of the Party's slogans – “WAR IS PEACE” as war. often demands retaliation in the development of technologies to develop more advanced forms of warfare. While 1984's technology is used to maintain oppressive government regimes and the absolute power of the Party, Metropolis' technology is meant to be used to improve the lives of citizens. In the Moloch scene, Freder imagines the machines consuming people, ironically showing the true beneficiaries of the city's technology. This is even more evident later in the film when the workers strike and the city collapses into chaos. Orwell and Lang's contemplative visions of technology in a dystopia encapsulate the fear of the unknown, particularly with.