The electoral college system that decides who will be president does not properly represent the views of the people. Therefore, the electoral college system should be replaced by a popular vote system, in which the presidential candidate who obtains the most votes in the election will win the presidency, instead of letting the candidate who obtains 270 electoral votes win . This way, citizens' votes more accurately reflect their opinions, instead of other people voting for them. Say no to plagiarism. Get a Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get an Original Essay The first reason why the Electoral College is unfair and should be abolished is that it is possible for a candidate to lose the vote popular and always lose elections. The most recent example of this phenomenon was in the 2000 election, where George Bush lost the popular vote, but defeated Al Gore in the general election, 271-266. The Electoral College prevents citizens from having a real say in election results. The popular vote represents the will of the people, and many Americans may not know how the electoral system works, or even that it exists. Having others vote on behalf of voting citizens takes away their power to choose. Another reason the Electoral College is unnecessary is that the system allows candidates to only have to campaign in a few important swing states in order to win over voters. Candidates spend most of their time on the campaign trail congregating in just a few key states, and other, smaller states receive little or no attention. Those who live in small states like Rhode Island and don't get as many visits as they would like will start to feel like their needs aren't being addressed. With a national popular vote, every voter has equal power, whether they come from New York or Montana. This will require riders to campaign across the United States, not just in a few large states..