Why are intelligent students considered anti-intellectuals in academia? In the article “Hidden Intellectualism” by Gerald Graff, he outlines the idea that street-smart students are much smarter than book-smart students. He explains that a street smart student will be able to solve a problem much faster than a street smart student due to their previous experience. According to the author, the problems with viewing street smart people as anti-intellectual are that they are actually much smarter than smart students, they don't have the same opportunities, and schools and colleges never challenge their minds to make them succeed in their academic works. students are much smarter than smart students because of their knowledge and experiences. The author states in the article: "I believe that street smarts beat book smarts in our culture, not because street smarts are not intellectual, as we generally assume , but because it satisfies an intellectual thirst more completely than school culture, which seems pale and unreal. ” meaning that street smart students are smarter than book smart students because of their large amount of information about many things and previous experiences. The author is right that smart students learn more from their mistakes and learn more from their previous experiences. According to the author, street smart students always try to learn from their mistakes, while reading smart students rely on books and study information. Book smart students never try to experience the problem situation, which gives them biased information and they don't learn much, while street smart students experience the problem situation. a problem and learn much more than book smarts. Book smart students are also smart because they learn a lot of information from books and reading. They also know how to use this information correctly to succeed academically, but these students learn much less from their mistakes and previous experiences to succeed than they do on the streets. intelligent students. Secondly, street smart students do not have equal opportunities to prove themselves in schools and colleges. In the article, the author states that "in competition, points were scored not by presenting arguments, but by a demonstration of information or extensive reading, by snatching notes or other forms of one-upmanship" , which is why many street smart students make arguments in academic competitions and they don't get enough points for their arguments to win a competition, where reading smart students only provide information from books and readings to win these competitions.

Essay / Why are intelligent students considered anti-intellectuals in academia? In the article “Hidden Intellectualism” by Gerald Graff, he outlines the idea that street-smart students are much smarter than book-smart students. He explains that a street smart student will be able to solve a problem much faster than a street smart student due to their previous experience. According to the author, the problems with viewing street smart people as anti-intellectual are that they are actually much smarter than smart students, they don't have the same opportunities, and schools and colleges never challenge their minds to make them succeed in their academic works. students are much smarter than smart students because of their knowledge and experiences. The author states in the article: "I believe that street smarts beat book smarts in our culture, not because street smarts are not intellectual, as we generally assume , but because it satisfies an intellectual thirst more completely than school culture, which seems pale and unreal. ” meaning that street smart students are smarter than book smart students because of their large amount of information about many things and previous experiences. The author is right that smart students learn more from their mistakes and learn more from their previous experiences. According to the author, street smart students always try to learn from their mistakes, while reading smart students rely on books and study information. Book smart students never try to experience the problem situation, which gives them biased information and they don't learn much, while street smart students experience the problem situation. a problem and learn much more than book smarts. Book smart students are also smart because they learn a lot of information from books and reading. They also know how to use this information correctly to succeed academically, but these students learn much less from their mistakes and previous experiences to succeed than they do on the streets. intelligent students. Secondly, street smart students do not have equal opportunities to prove themselves in schools and colleges. In the article, the author states that "in competition, points were scored not by presenting arguments, but by a demonstration of information or extensive reading, by snatching notes or other forms of one-upmanship" , which is why many street smart students make arguments in academic competitions and they don't get enough points for their arguments to win a competition, where reading smart students only provide information from books and readings to win these competitions.

Navigation

« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Get In Touch